Dr. Soumya Swaminathan chief scientist for the World Health Organization, has been charged by the Mumbai-based association of lawyers of “running a disinformation campaign against Ivermectin by deliberate suppression of effectiveness of drug Ivermectin as a prophylaxis and for treatment of Covid-19, despite the existence of large amounts of clinical data compiled and presented by esteemedd, highly qualified, experienced medical doctors and scientists.”
Are public health bureaucrats trustworthy, or are they on the take from Big Pharma? Why do they suppress the evidence of known cures and instead push dangerous and deadly vaccines?
There is no doubt that Ivermectin and HCQ are safe and effective both as cures and as preventatives. Recently, I posted links to the 305 studies of HCQ’s effectiveness and the 96 studies of Ivermectin’s studies. https://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2021/06/10/when-will-the-mass-murder-by-public-health-authorities-and-health-care-providers-cease/
The question that is evaded by “public health authorities,” the Big Pharma indoctrinated majority of the medical profession, and the presstitute media is why were the known treatments suppressed?
There are two obvious answers, neither reassuring.
One is that it was done for the vaccine profits of Big Pharma, profits that were used to make 9 new billionaires while the rest of us experience exploding food prices.
The other, more disturbing, is that it was done to maximize deaths and use fear to drive people to take an experimental, untested, vaccine. Why? Is the intent population control? Evidence is mounting that the vaccine attacks female fertility. https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/covid-vaccine-spike-protein-travels-from-injection-site-organ-damage/
We know exaggerated Covid case numbers and death rates are being used to erase civil liberties and justify coercion of people forcing them to accept a dangerous and often deadly vaccination. https://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2021/06/11/coercion-is-used-to-force-a-dangerous-vaccination/
What is most disturbing is that despite the clear evidence that the Covid threat is greatly overstated and that cures are readily available, governments and public health authorities are pushing harder than ever to vaccinate everyone despite the evidence that the vaccine is more dangerous to many than Covid itself. The Pakistani government, if government it is, promises to disable people’s iPhones if they refuse to be vaccinated.
Some California health authorities are demanding mandatory vaccinations of everyone in the state.
What explains the worldwide identical response to a media-hyped-up-threat exposed by large numbers of experts? I don’t know the answer. What I do know is that the official narrative is not accepted by large numbers of independent experts. I also know that those behind the official narrative pay experts who sell their integrity to support, despite the evidence, the official narrative, which is a lie.
What we can safely conclude is that we should not believe any official explanation, any public health authority, any government, and most certainly not believe the pressitutes such as the New York Times, Washington Post, NPR, CNN, MSNBC, BBC.
The proof is in: For many age groups the Covid vaccine is more dangerous than Covid. https://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2021/06/09/for-most-people-the-covid-vaccines-are-more-deadly-than-covid/
Why haven’t you heard this proven fact from the New York Times, Washington Post, NPR, CNN, MSNBC, BBC?
The fact that you have not should tell you something.
by Paul Craig Roberts
Join: 👉 https://t.me/acnewspatriots
The opinions expressed by contributors and/or content partners are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of AC.NEWS
Disclaimer: This article may contain statements that reflect the opinion of the author. The contents of this article are of sole responsibility of the author(s). AC.News will not be responsible for any inaccurate or incorrect statement in this article www.ac.news websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner. Reprinting this article: Non-commercial use OK. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.