USA: The Kansas Senate on Monday voted to override Gov. Laura Kelly’s veto on The Fairness in Women’s Sports Act, a bill that would ban biological male athletes from competing in women’s school sports across the state.
Also known as SB 160, the legislation “requires interscholastic, intercollegiate, intramural, or club athletic teams or sports that are sponsored by public educational institutions” to ban male students from joining teams or sports “designated for females.”
It does not ban female athletes or girls from participating in men’s or boys’ sports.
The bill was introduced by Republicans in February 2021 and vetoed by Kelly on April 15.
However, the Senate voted 28–10 on Monday to override the governor’s veto, and it now heads to the House for lawmakers to vote to sustain or override the veto.
Republican sponsors of the bill say it is needed to create fairness and protect the integrity of female sports and opportunities for girls to gain college athletic scholarships.
If the bill is violated, it allows any student deprived of an athletic opportunity or who suffers direct or indirect harm to file a civil suit and seek relief in the form of monetary damages.
“Men should not be competing in women’s sports,” Kansas Attorney General Derek Schmidt said after the veto earlier this month. “Governor Kelly today vetoed (for the second time) a bill to implement that commonsense principle. I would have signed the bill into law.”
But critics, including the American Civil Liberties Union of Kansas, say the legislation is prejudiced and harmful and targets trans children in the state.
“This bill embodied the worst of cynical politics; it was a solution in search of a problem, coldly trading the safety of Kansas children for cheap political points,” ACLU of Kansas Executive Director Micah Kubic said. “It was legalized bullying in the name of identity politics.”
At least 15 states have enacted similar bills on transgender athletes, which has prompted lawsuits in Tennessee and Florida.
The Senate also voted on Monday to override the veto on the “Parents’ Bill of Rights,” also known as SB 58, in a 27–12 vote.
That bill enumerates 12 rights reserved by the state for parents with regards to their child, including the right to “be informed of and inspect any materials, activities, and curriculum provided to the child,” and “object to any learning material or activity” that they believe may harm their child due to the “parent’s beliefs, values, or principles.”
Republican state Sen. Renee Erickson told Washington-based Just the News on Thursday that the bills are part of a “bigger fight” against Democrats.
“We know that they will use any means at their disposal to further their ideology and their agenda. But we’re on to them; parents are on to them,” she said, adding, “If anything positive happened from the pandemic, it’s [that] parents woke up, and they’re seeing what’s going on. And they don’t like it.”
With regards to SB 160, Erickson said the legislation will “ensure that Kansas girls and women have a level playing field when it comes to sports competition.”
The SB 58 legislation focuses on “reaffirming that parents are the most important educator in their child’s lives and affirming the right that they have to know what is being taught in schools,” Erickson said.
Tammy Hung contributed to this report.
Join: 👉 https://t.me/acnewspatriots
The opinions expressed by contributors and/or content partners are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of AC.NEWS
Disclaimer: This article may contain statements that reflect the opinion of the author. The contents of this article are of sole responsibility of the author(s). AC.News will not be responsible for any inaccurate or incorrect statement in this article www.ac.news websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner. Reprinting this article: Non-commercial use OK. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.
Discussion about this post