USA: “The PCR is a Process. It does not tell you that you are sick”. Dr. Kary Mullis, Nobel Laureate and Inventor of the RT-PCR, passed away in August 2019.
This misuse of the RT-PCR technique is applied as a relentless and intentional strategy by some governmentsto justify excessive measures such as the violation of a large number of constitutional rights, … under the pretext of a pandemic based on a number of positive RT-PCR tests, and not on a real number of patients. .Dr. Pascal Sacré, Belgian physician specialized in critical care and renowned public health analyst.
Smoking Gun: As of January 1, 2022, the CDC in a request to the FDA withdraws it’s endorsement of the RT-PCR test.
The CDC acknowledges that the PCR test does not effectively differentiate between Covid-19 and Seasonal Influenza.
Amply documented and analyzed by numerous scientists, the PCR test does not detect or identify SARS-CoV-2 and its variants.
While the CDC does not officially acknowledge that the PCR test is invalid, it nonetheless calls for it to be withdrawn.
If the PCR test is invalid as suggested by the CDC’s statement, the 260 Million so-called “Confirmed Covid-19 Cases” collected and tabulated Worldwide since the outset of the alleged pandemic are meaningless.
There is no Pandemic.
In the Course of the Next FIVE Days the RT-PCR Test in the US will be Declared Invalid?
In a bombshell decision, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) have withdrawn the insidious PCR test as a valid method for detecting and identifying SARS-CoV-2.
“After December 31, 2021, CDC will withdraw the request to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) of the CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel, the assay first introduced in February 2020 for detection of SARS-CoV-2 only.”
In preparation for this change, CDC recommends clinical laboratories and testing sites that have been using the CDC 2019-nCoV RT-PCR assay select and begin their transition to another FDA-authorized COVID-19 test.
CDC encourages laboratories to consider adoption of a multiplexed method that can facilitate detection and differentiation of SARS-CoV-2 and influenza viruses. Such assays can facilitate continued testing for both influenza and SARS-CoV-2 and can save both time and resources as we head into influenza season. Laboratories and testing sites should validate and verify their selected assay within their facility before beginning clinical testing. (emphasis added)
It has taken them almost two years to recognize that the PCR test is flawed and invalid.
Read carefully, what this CDC directive admits is that the PCR test cannot differentiate between “SARS-CoV-2 and influenza viruses”. We have known this from the outset.
This advisory by the CDC issued in July 2021 is to be enforced in the course of the next couple of weeks leading up to the January 1st, 2022 deadline.
Will it be carried out?? Visibly there is no transition towards “another authorized Covid-19 test”.
The Covid-19 Omicron Christmas Lockdown
WHY is CDC waiting until December 31, 2021 to enforce the suspension of the invalid and flawed PCR test?
Seasonal influenza which starts in October has contributed to driving up the number of so-called “Confirmed Covid-19 Cases”.
And in recent developments, these PCR positive cases are routinely being categorized as “Confirmed Covid-19 Omicron Variant Cases”. It’s also a period of the year when people catch a corona common cold which often results in a PCR positive.
This upward movement of PCR positive cases is now being used by corrupt politicians to sustain the Omicron fear campaign as well as impose the “The Covid-19 Christmas Lockdown”.
Millions of people Worldwide are lining up to be tested as well as vaccinated to “protect themselves” against SARS-CoV-2 (which cannot not under any circumstances be identified by the PCR test).
What this means is a Mea Culpa. A tacit recognition by the CDC and the FDA that the entire data base generated by the PCR test is invalid.
Almost a year ago, in January 2021, the WHO questioned the validity of the PCR test which it had itself put forth as a means to detecting and identifying SARS-CoV-2 at the outset of the alleged pandemic in January 2020.
The Data Base of the Alleged Covid-19 Pandemic
Several billion people in more than 190 countries have been tested (as well as retested) for Covid-19 using the PCR test which is flawed and invalid.
We are talking about approximately 260 million alleged “Confirmed Covid-19 Cases” (PCR positives) Worldwide.
The pandemic is said to have resulted in more than 5 million Covid-19 related deaths.
These are nonsensical and meaningless numbers. It’s a Big Lie.
And this data base is being used to justify the imposition of the Covid-19 mRNA “killer virus”, not to mention the “vaccine passport”.
Bear in mind, in recent developments, the PCR test is being routinely used to allegedly “identify”the variants including Delta and Omicron, which is an impossibility as well as a lie.
Scientific nonsense. PCR positive cases (which according to the CDC could be the result of seasonal influenza) are now being routinely assigned to the Omicron Variant:
By Prof Michel Chossudovsky
Join: 👉 https://t.me/acnewspatriots
The opinions expressed by contributors and/or content partners are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of AC.NEWS
Disclaimer: This article may contain statements that reflect the opinion of the author. The contents of this article are of sole responsibility of the author(s). AC.News will not be responsible for any inaccurate or incorrect statement in this article www.ac.news websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner. Reprinting this article: Non-commercial use OK. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.