USA: A deep analysis of VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System) data shows that “red” states – meaning those that align politically as being more conservative – are getting hit the hardest by Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) “vaccine” deaths.
In what appears to be a politically motivated genocide, the powers that be (i.e., the pharmaceutical industry and big government) are reportedly sending deadlier batches of Fauci Flu shots to conservative areas of the country.
Blue areas are getting cleaner jabs while red areas are being sent the more toxic varieties, says Greg Reese from Infowars.
“Some red states are seeing 11-times more vaccine deaths than other states,” Reese claims – you can watch his video report below. “On average, red states are experiencing twice the amount of vaccine deaths and injuries than blue states.”
This video is from channel “Health Ranger Report” on Brighteon.com.
Ex-head of respiratory research at Pfizer, Mike Yeadon and researchers like Craig Paardekooper sourced VAERS data on vaccine death and injury in the United States, which currently shows more than 700,000 adverse reactions associated with the Pfizer-BioNTech, Moderna, and Janssen (Johnson & Johnson) injections.
These jabs were deployed in different batches, or lots, that show extremely disparate rates of injury and death. Some lots are causing almost no problems while others are causing many problems.
How can this be if all of the jabs are truly the same? Back-engineering conducted by Yeadon and Paardekooper uncovered the fact that not all covid jab lots are the same – you can learn more about this at HowBadIsMyBatch.com (or at HowBad.info).
“About 0.5 percent of all the different batches are highly toxic, resulting in hospitalization, disability, and death within days or weeks of injection,” Reese says. “Other batches cause minimal adverse reactions and most appear to be harmless placebos.”
“When plotted on a timeline, we can see that these three companies have been working together to quietly monitor the lethal effectiveness of specific deadly batches.”
Reese also says that while one company is deploying a lethal batch, the other two are deploying harmless ones. This creates a scientific environment for the genocidal eugenicists to perform dose-range finding, or the maximum tolerated dose for each specific batch of injections.
“The timeline shows that each lethal batch deployment is preceded and followed by a quiet period, allowing them time to establish their baseline before the next deadly batch is deployed,” Reese explains.
“Private leaked documents from the CDC show a list of expiry dates, and only certain lots are included – the very same lots found to be highly toxic in Paardekooper’s database, which makes sense. There would be no reason to list expiration dates for saline placebo; only the deadly ones.”
The hardest-hit state in terms of toxic jab batches appears to be Montana at 11.3 deaths per 100,000, followed by Tennessee at 9.1 deaths per 100,000. In third place, however, is Minnesota, a blue state, at 9.0 deaths per 100,000.
“Analysis of the number of dying per 100,000 vaccinated in 50 states shows us that the overwhelming majority of vaccine deaths are happening in red states,” Reese warns.
“Some red states are experiencing 11 times more vaccine deaths than other states. On average, red states are experiencing twice the amount of vaccine deaths and injuries than blue states.”
Could it be that the establishment is specifically targeting states with largest populations of people who oppose the “Build Back Better” (6uild 6ack 6etter) of the current regime? Is there an effort afoot to exterminate people who oppose the “Great Reset?”
by: Ethan Huff
Join: 👉 https://t.me/acnewspatriots
The opinions expressed by contributors and/or content partners are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of AC.NEWS
Disclaimer: This article may contain statements that reflect the opinion of the author. The contents of this article are of sole responsibility of the author(s). AC.News will not be responsible for any inaccurate or incorrect statement in this article www.ac.news websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner. Reprinting this article: Non-commercial use OK. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.
Discussion about this post