USA/UK: That the United States government will speedily see its extradition demands met in the case of WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange has been in increasing doubt over much of the past year as the US side must prove based on UK law that he won’t face cruel or torturous confinement.
If extradited Assange is facing life in prison on espionage charges, likely at the Colorado supermax where inmates spend 23 of 24 hours a day in solitary confinement inside a small cell; however, this week the US government is trying to give “assurances” to a UK court that he “won’t be held under the strictest maximum-security conditions if extradited to the US,” according to new Wall Street Journal reporting on Wednesday.
On this very basis of Assange likely facing cruel confinement if extradited to US soil, a UK court previously blocked his extradition in January, but on Wednesday the UK ruled in favor of a US appeal.
During the January ruling the judge reasoned that he would be a suicide risk based on his delicate psychological state – having spent much of the last decade of his life confined – first inside the Ecuadoran embassy in London while on the run, and since his apprehension from the embassy inside the high security Belmarsh prison.
As part of a “package of assurances” the US also said it would allow Assange to choose to serve any jail time in his native Australia if convicted:
“The U.S. has given the U.K. a package of assurances that Mr. Assange won’t be held at ADX, a maximum-security federal penitentiary in Colorado, or subject to extra security measures, a Crown Prosecution Service spokesman said in an email, potentially removing the main bar to his extradition,” WSJ continues.
All of this appears but a ploy to get him into US custody. An “assurance” is just that… in reality nothing more than a “but trust me” and a wink, given that once legally in US detention all bets are off – a prior “assurance” to a foreign state has no legal bearing on his fate at that point.
BREAKING: The US has been granted limited permission to appeal January’s decision that Julian #Assange should not be extradited
“The new revelations concerning the DoJ’s lead witness confirm what we all knew: that the case against Julian has been built on lies” | Stella Moris pic.twitter.com/ueGSEDxcyX
— WikiLeaks (@wikileaks) July 7, 2021
As WikiLeaks itself has lately pointed out, the US legal team looks increasingly desperate, hence these latest empty “promises” in order to keep the extradition proceedings alive.
by Tyler Durden
Join: 👉 https://t.me/acnewspatriots
The opinions expressed by contributors and/or content partners are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of AC.NEWS
Disclaimer: This article may contain statements that reflect the opinion of the author. The contents of this article are of sole responsibility of the author(s). AC.News will not be responsible for any inaccurate or incorrect statement in this article www.ac.news websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner. Reprinting this article: Non-commercial use OK. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.
