The response went on to discharge all responsibility for diagnoses and treatment onto health professionals, clarifying that “tests, by themselves, are not usually sufficient to determine the disease.”
Amazingly, the Spanish newspaper El Diestro reported on September 30 that these so-called “tests,” which have repeatedly been proven fraudulent, “are not usually enough to determine the disease.” Despite this, PCR tests have been used to justify government impositions about lockdowns, mask mandates and now, “vaccine” requirements.
Here in the United States, hundreds of Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests have revealed that there is not a single record anywhere in the world of SARS-CoV-2 having been isolated or purified.
“Would a sane person mix a patient sample (containing various sources of genetic material and never proven to contain any particular virus) with transfected monkey kidney cells, fetal bovine serum and toxic drugs, then claim that the resulting concoction is ‘SARS-COV-2 isolate’ and ship it off internationally for use in critical research (including vaccine and test development)?” asked The Exposé‘s Christine Massey.
“Because that’s the sort of fraudulent monkey business that’s being passed off as ‘virus isolation’ by research teams around the world.
When pressed for proof that covid really exists, governments have nothing to show
On Feb. 15, 2021, Kepa Ormazabal, a Spanish researcher, submitted an FOIA request about this very thing. He wanted to see proof that SARS-CoV-2 had truly been isolated and purified, and determined to exist in the way the government claims it does.
The Basque Country Office of the President and Department of Health, along with all other dependent institutions, ignored Ormazabal’s request because they had nothing to say.
“According to the law, they have 30 days to respond,” Ormazabal’s told the media several months later. “[Sixty days] if the question is especially complex. Today is May 2nd and I have not heard from them.”
On March 30, Ormazabal submitted another FOIA request to the Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (Higher Council of Scientific Research), which is considered the flagship of Spanish research. Once again, Ormazabal did not receive a response.
“Again, they have not responded and, therefore, their silence is refusing access to the information they may hold in regards to my question,” Ormazabal reported.
“The CSIC and the Basque government are public institutions and, therefore, must comply with the law of transparency, good governance and access to public information. Article 20.4 of this law states that, if after 30 days there has been no response from the public administration, this silence is to be understood as meaning that the request to access the public information solicited has been refused.”
To this day, not a single government or research agency has procured solid evidence that SARS-CoV-2 is real in the way we have all been told. There are no sample cultures available or really anything to show that the China Virus is anything other than a false flag plandemic exercise being used to usher the planet into a new world order.
By Ethan Huff
Join: 👉 https://t.me/acnewspatriots
The opinions expressed by contributors and/or content partners are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of AC.NEWS
Disclaimer: This article may contain statements that reflect the opinion of the author. The contents of this article are of sole responsibility of the author(s). AC.News will not be responsible for any inaccurate or incorrect statement in this article www.ac.news websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner. Reprinting this article: Non-commercial use OK. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.