USA: The U.S. judge in charge of the dispute over records seized from former President Donald Trump’s Florida home on Sept. 22 blocked the special master she appointed from viewing documents with classified markings that were taken from Mar-a-Lago.
U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon, a Trump appointee, removed about 100 documents marked as classified from her earlier order’s definition of “seized material.”
Cannon also struck two paragraphs from the earlier order.
One such paragraph stated that the government would have to “make available for inspection by Plaintiff’s counsel, with controlled access conditions (including necessary clearance requirements) and under the supervision of the Special Master, the documents marked as classified and the papers attached to such document.”
The other stated that “the Special Master and the parties shall prioritize, as a matter of timing, the documents marked as classified, and the Special Master shall submit interim reports and recommendations as appropriate. Upon receipt and resolution of any interim reports and recommendations, the Court will consider prompt adjustments to the Court’s orders as necessary.”
Cannon is a judge of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida.
The changes were outlined in an order handed down the morning after a panel of judges on the appeals court overseeing the district court said Cannon “likely erred” in her order when she blocked the U.S. Department of Justice from using the records with classification markings for its investigation into Trump and when she ordered the government to let U.S. District Judge Raymond Dearie, the special master, and Trump lawyers access the materials, which Trump says he declassified but the government claims are still classified.
Cannon sided with Trump on Sept. 15 and inserted Dearie into the process, finding that it was important to not “accept the Government’s conclusions” on the records in question.
She also said it wasn’t appropriate at that time to accept the government’s assertion that Trump has no plausible claim of privilege to any of the documents.
However, the appeals court panel, responding to a motion for a partial stay from the government, said that “we cannot discern why Plaintiff would have an individual interest in or need for any of the one-hundred documents with classification marking.”
“Plaintiff has not even attempted to show that he has a need to know the information contained in the classified documents. Nor has he established that the current administration has waived that requirement for these documents. And even if he had, that, in and of itself, would not explain why Plaintiff has an individual interest in the classified documents,” the court stated.
“Plaintiff suggests that he may have declassified these documents when he was President. But the record contains no evidence that any of these records were declassified. And before the special master, Plaintiff resisted providing any evidence that he had declassified any of these documents.”
Even if Trump had declassified the materials, that wouldn’t explain a personal interest in them, the panel also noted.
They ordered a halt to Cannon’s order with respect to the materials marked classified.
Join: 👉 https://t.me/acnewspatriots
The opinions expressed by contributors and/or content partners are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of AC.NEWS
Disclaimer: This article may contain statements that reflect the opinion of the author. The contents of this article are of sole responsibility of the author(s). AC.News will not be responsible for any inaccurate or incorrect statement in this article www.ac.news websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner. Reprinting this article: Non-commercial use OK. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.
Discussion about this post