USA: The U.S. Senate does not have to release its full report detailing the Central Intelligence Agency’s interrogation and detention program following the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, a federal judge ruled Thursday.
Journalist Shawn Musgrave sought the 6,700-page document, citing a “common law right of access” to public records and asking the judge to recognize a legal argument conceptually similar to the Freedom of Information Act. Congress is not subject to the Freedom of Information Act, and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit ruled in 2016 that the report was a congressional record. Musgrave’s legal argument was made in an attempt to get around that limitation.
Common law right of access is decided in the D.C. Circuit based on a two-part test that requires a determination that the document is a public record and then balancing the government’s interest in keeping the document secret against the public’s interest in disclosure.
District of Columbia District Court Judge Beryl Howell ruled that the report “does not qualify as a public record subject to the common-law right of public access” because while it was part of the committee’s investigation, it did not make recommendations or propose legislation.
The government interest in keeping the information secret outweighs public interest, Howell wrote.
“The Report contains highly classified information about the CIA’s detention and interrogation policies and procedures that would compromise national security if released, far outweighing the public’s interest in disclosure,” Howell said in her opinion dismissing the case.
Musgrave’s attorney, Kel McClanahan, did not immediately return a call seeking comment Thursday.
Former Senate Intelligence Committee Chairwoman Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., released part of the report in 2014 over the objections of the intelligence community, making public a 500-page executive summary that said the CIA misled the White House and the public about torture of detainees in Afghanistan. She favored releasing the full report, but much of the more than remaining 6,000 pages is classified.
“I agree with the judge that the Senate Intelligence Committee should retain control over its own documents. I also continue to believe the full torture report — with appropriate redactions — should be released at some point,” Feinstein said in a statement. “The use of torture by the American government was a dark mark on our history that must never be allowed to happen again. We must continue to learn from our mistakes, and that means eventually releasing the torture report at an appropriate time.”
President Barack Obama declared the full report part of his presidential records before he left office, which preserved a copy in the National Archives. Public requests for the document could trigger declassification starting in 2029.
When Republicans controlled the Senate under then-President Donald Trump, Intelligence Committee Chairman Richard Burr, R-N.C., insisted that all other copies of the report be retrieved from the executive branch, where they could potentially be subject to the Freedom of Information Act.
A spokeswoman for Sen. Mark Warner, D-Va., the current committee chairman, did not immediately return a request for comment Thursday.
By Tribune News Service – Sarah D. Wire
Join: 👉 https://t.me/acnewspatriots
The opinions expressed by contributors and/or content partners are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of AC.NEWS
Disclaimer: This article may contain statements that reflect the opinion of the author. The contents of this article are of sole responsibility of the author(s). AC.News will not be responsible for any inaccurate or incorrect statement in this article www.ac.news websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner. Reprinting this article: Non-commercial use OK. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.
Discussion about this post