USA: No, they can’t
A poll conducted by WPA Intelligence has found that almost one quarter of Democratic voters believe that “some men can become pregnant.”
Twenty-two percent of Democrats overall agreed with the statement.
WPA Intelligence poll: Now you are going to read some statements that are commonly shared. Please indicate whether you believe that statement to be True or False.
"SOME MEN CAN GET PREGNANT"
DEMOCRATS:
TRUE — 22%
FALSE — 78%WHITE WOMEN COLLEGE
TRUE — 36%
FALSE — 64% pic.twitter.com/bthhEVYxMc— InteractivePolls (@IAPolls2022) September 7, 2022
The poll also found that more women agreed with the statement, and an incredible 36 percent of white, college-educated female Democrats agreed.
🚨OUR LATEST POLL🚨
Misinformation isn't a one-way street. One out of five Democrats believe men can get pregnant, including:
❌ 36% of college-educated white Dem women
❌ 27% of self-described liberals
❌ 29% of white Democratic women
❌ 21% of Biden voters pic.twitter.com/CvTP3mvziY— WPA Intelligence (@WPAIntel) September 7, 2022
WPAi Managing Director Conor Maguire commented that “with 36% of a core Democratic constituency (college-educated white Democratic women) and one out of five Democrat voters believing this, one can see why Democratic leaders coddle the radical gender theory movement.”
The findings come following weeks of Democratic witnesses testifying at Judiciary Committee hearings in the House that they believe men can get pregnant and have abortions.
UC Berkley Law Professor Khiara Bridges refused to use the word ‘woman’ and accused Missouri GOP Senator Josh Hawley of being “transphobic” and “inciting violence” for saying men can’t have babies.
A pro-abortion lunatic has a meltdown when she's told men can't get pregnant and accuses Sen. Josh Hawley of transphobia.
This is the Left in 2022. It's a big reason why they're tanking in the polls. pic.twitter.com/fJJrtLb5gQ
— Jason Rantz on KTTH Radio (@jasonrantz) July 12, 2022
Many of them also refused to define what a woman is, with National Women’s Law Center president Fatima Goss-Graves telling Republicans that “You’re trying to suggest that people who don’t identify as women can’t get pregnant.”
Last month all 50 Democrats in the Senate voted against an amendment that sought to define pregnancy as a uniquely biologically female process.
Since only biological females can become pregnant I offered an amendment to limit our federal pregnancy programs to biological females
All 50 Senate democrats voted against itpic.twitter.com/bUAIEpqujW
— Marco Rubio (@marcorubio) August 7, 2022
This lunacy isn’t just restricted to woke academics making a scene in Congress, but is translating through to real life with terms including “women” or “mothers” being replaced by doctors in hospitals with “birthing people” or “pregnant people” to appease people with gender dysphoria or just straight up mental illness.
The Academy of Breastfeeding Medicine in the U.S. has issued a new guide, advising hospitals and health carers to change their language to be more “gender-inclusive”.
The guide lists “traditional terms” such as ‘breast milk’ and then suggests woke alternatives including “human milk”, “parent’s milk”, and most ridiculously “father’s milk.”
As we highlighted back in June, the NHS in the UK caused controversy by erasing all references to women from an online advice section about the menopause, an exclusively female condition.
During the same month, which by no coincidence was also ‘Pride Month’, the NHS website altered its guidance pages on ovarian cancer, removing instances of the word “women” in a move that sources said was intended to be more “inclusive” toward trans, non-binary and intersex people.
This trend has reached as far as dictionaries literally changing the definition of the word “female” to include anyone who identifies as one.
We also face a future where if you type the ‘wrong’ word, Google will correct your language to help you become more ‘inclusive’.
by Steve Watson
Join: 👉 https://t.me/acnewspatriots
The opinions expressed by contributors and/or content partners are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of AC.NEWS
Disclaimer: This article may contain statements that reflect the opinion of the author. The contents of this article are of sole responsibility of the author(s). AC.News will not be responsible for any inaccurate or incorrect statement in this article www.ac.news websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner. Reprinting this article: Non-commercial use OK. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.
Discussion about this post