WORLD: Klaus Schwab’s World Economic Forum has announced plans to launch a Covid-19 digital passport to with the stated objective of “enabling people to visit countries, conferences and sports events safely.” However, to obtain a digital passport you will need to send your DNA in the form of a blood sample to the WEF.
Users of the digital passport will have their blood screened at an unidentified WEF-approved biolaboratory and those who pass the test will be granted a “QR health visa code” that they can download to their phone.
The WEF’s latest plan to invade our privacy and steal our health data has been described as “very sinister” by privacy campaigners. And let’s face it, why should we be providing our precious bodily fluids to nameless and faceless biolabs working for Klaus Schwab?
While the elites attempt to convince us that we have nothing to fear, it’s worth remembering that the elites themselves do not share their DNA with anyone for fear of “DNA theft.”
In February this year, French President Emmanuel Macron refused a Kremlin request that he take a Russian COVID-19 test when he arrived to see President Putin, to prevent Russia getting hold of Macron’s DNA.
It’s yet another case of “one rule for me, and another for thee.” President Macron is one of Klaus Schwab’s Young Global Leaders. Since taking office in 2016, Macron has worked to implement the WEF Agenda in France and the EU.
So President Macron is refusing to submit his blood to foreign biolabs for fear of DNA theft. But we are supposed to trust Klaus Schwab and the World Economic Forum and hand over our DNA to them?
It’s not a good idea. For a vision of the future Klaus Schwab is planning for us, we can look to China which has a fully-fledged Covid pass and digital passport system already in use.
Unsurprisingly, it’s an authoritarian hellscape. Last month reports emerged that the Chinese health app, which was developed to enforce the Communist party’s draconian lockdown restrictions, is being repurposed to tighten political control on dissidents and others deemed to be troublemakers.
The Spectator reports:
The ‘traffic light app’, as it has been dubbed, assigns Chinese citizens a colour code: green, yellow or red to signify Covid infection risk. Those with green are free to move around; red can mean instant quarantine.
Cities are blanketed with automated code readers – at the entrances to underground stations, offices, malls, apartment blocks, banks and even in taxis. Movement is nigh-on impossible without a green code. Main roads into the southern city of Shenzhen have even been policed by drones hovering above traffic and displaying a QR code which drivers had to scan before being allowed entry.
But it seems that Covid isn’t the only thing that can affect your traffic light status.
Last month hundreds of Chinese citizens were grounded by the app when they went to a bank that had frozen their money. They had been fighting to get their savings back, but when they tried to reach the bank’s headquarters in Zhengzhou, they received red health warnings on their Covid-19 apps and were instantly quarantined.
A coincidence? Many in China don’t think so… And the CCP has already floated the idea of making the app permanent once their never-ending fight against Covid is over.
China should serve as a warning. Authoritarian organizations like Klaus Schwab’s WEF must be resisted. Once we hand over our rights and our DNA to the shadowy elite, the future will no longer be in our hands.
by Baxter Dmitry
Join: 👉 https://t.me/acnewspatriots
The opinions expressed by contributors and/or content partners are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of AC.NEWS
Disclaimer: This article may contain statements that reflect the opinion of the author. The contents of this article are of sole responsibility of the author(s). AC.News will not be responsible for any inaccurate or incorrect statement in this article www.ac.news websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner. Reprinting this article: Non-commercial use OK. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.
Discussion about this post