Russia reports an attack with two drones on the Kremlin for an attack on President Vladimir Putin and announces energetic responses but the Kiev government spokesman denies any responsibility saying that it is not among their goals to attack other countries.
The denials of Volodymir Zelensky’s Ukrainian regime might even have been credible if they hadn’t come to the end of a long series of attacks on sensitive targets in which the Russian intelligence FSB has always identified the hand of Ukrainian terrorists.
In both the August 2022 bombing attack on journalist Darya Dugina, daughter of Russian Christian philosopher Alexander Dugin, and the February 2023 bombing of blogger and former Donbass fighter Vladlen Tatarsky, Russia’s Federal Security Service (FSB) identified the mastermind of Kiev.
But the responsibilities of the Ukrainian secret services had also emerged in relation to the sabotage of the Kerch bridgewhich connects Crimea to the Russian region of Krasnodar as well as in the numerous attacks on the Russian border city Bryansk.
It was targeted by an attack by Ukrainian saboteurs on March 2, 2023, triggering the retaliation of the Moscow army which launched 84 missiles on Ukraine, including at least 6 Kinzhal, very lethal because they cannot be intercepted.
In recent days, Bryansk has again been targeted with drone attacks and a suspected explosion that derailed a train.
The impression is that the Kiev regime, supported by neo-Nazi paramilitary groups, wants to provoke an escalation of the conflict with continuous provocations after the repeated defeats in the field that make a counter-offensive in the Donbass difficult.
This is why Zelensky’s strategy, ever more a servant of NATO and the Weapons Lobby, may be to deliberately cause a reaction with Putin’s nuclear weapons to justify the outbreak of a war without borders.
This would be very dangerous for Mediterranean Countries due to the presence of Admiral Gorshkov frigate in Syrian Tartus harbor with the Zircon missile which can be load an atomic warhead.
Russian President Vladimir Putin was not harmed and continues to work as usual after Kiev’s attempted drone attack against the Kremlin this night, the presidential press service said on Wednesday.
“The Russian president was not harmed as a result of the terrorist attack. His schedule has not changed and continues as usual,” the press service said.
«According to the press service, this night “the Kiev regime carried out an attempt to deliver a strike by unmanned aerial vehicles on the Kremlin residence of the Russian president.” “Two unmanned aerial vehicles targeted the Kremlin,” it said» Tass Russian News Agency reported.
Here the link video if Rumble doesn’t run correctly.
An unverified video circulating on social media shows show the moment one of the drones struck the Senate Palace. The footage shows the unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) approaching the building at a low altitude, before blowing up right over its dome. The blast appeared not to have dealt any significant damage to the building, as even the flagstaff with the presidential banner remained in place after the attack.
“As a result of timely actions taken by military and special services using electronic warfare systems, the drones were disabled,” the Kremlin stated. “Their fall and the fragments scattered around on the territory of the Kremlin caused no casualties or material damage,” the press service stressed.
The Russian president on Tuesday worked in St. Petersburg, where he gave the go-ahead to resume tram traffic in Mariupol via video link, held a meeting with the government and a number of other working meetings. Putin also met in person with famous Russian conductor Valery Gergiev, who marked his 70th birthday.
Kremlin Spokesman Dmitry Peskov told reporters that on Wednesday Putin is working in Novo-Ogaryovo outside Moscow, where he met with Nizhny Novgorod Governor Gleb Nikitin.
Kiev: our goal is to free the country, not hit others
“We have no information on the alleged attacks against the Kremlin, but as President Zelensky has repeatedly stated, Ukraine is using all its forces and means at its disposal to liberate its territories and not to attack others.”
Thus the spokesman of the Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelensky, Sergei Nikiforov, told BBC news. According to Nikiforov, the real attack is against the inhabitants of the buildings in Dnipro and Uman recently hit by Russian missiles.
“What happened in Moscow is obviously an attempt to escalate the situation ahead of May 9,” he added. Victory Day is celebrated in Russia on May 9 in memory of the triumph over Nazi Germany in World War II.
Moscow’s response to the overnight drone attack on the Kremlin should be as harsh as possible. So far, everything points to the Ukrainian trail, Leonid Slutsky, the head of the State Duma’s Committee on International Affairs, said on Wednesday.
Ukraine attempted to attack the Kremlin in the early hours of Wednesday, using two drones, the Russian presidential press service said, adding that the drones were promptly disabled and there were no casualties in the incident. The Kremlin said that the incident was considered to be an attempted assassination of Russian President Vladimir Putin. Russia retains the right to respond in kind “whenever and wherever it sees fit,” the press service added.
“The office of [Ukrainian President Vladimir] Zelensky, who is on a tour of Finland, is muttering some mindless rabble, excuses and statements about the non-involvement in the drone attack on the Kremlin. It’s very hard to believe, everything points to the Ukrainian trail,” Slutsky wrote on his Telegram channel.
According to him, there is no point in talking once again about the Kiev regime’s crossing red lines. “The purpose of the planned terrorist attack and assassination attempt on the Russian president was, undoubtedly, to sow panic among the Russians on the eve of Victory Day. Therefore, the response should be harsh, as harsh as possible,” the lawmaker added.
Join: 👉 https://t.me/acnewspatriots
The opinions expressed by contributors and/or content partners are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of AC.NEWS
Disclaimer: This article may contain statements that reflect the opinion of the author. The contents of this article are of sole responsibility of the author(s). AC.News will not be responsible for any inaccurate or incorrect statement in this article www.ac.news websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner. Reprinting this article: Non-commercial use OK. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.
Discussion about this post