Data from over 1,500 death reports showed that nobody under the age of 60 should get the COVID vaccine.
An analysis done by the Vaccine Safety Research Foundation Executive Director Steve Kirsch revealed there had been more deaths than expected among vaccinated people in a population control group.
This, according to Kirsch, is a precautionary principle that suggests it is much safer for people under the age of 60 to remain unvaccinated. While there could be errors in the analysis or survey bias errors that could change the result, the preliminary data showed that taking the vaccine is dangerous. (Related: Investigation proves Pfizer vaccine offers less than 1% protection against COVID-19.)
In a mortality survey, he asked people to report the date, age and vaccine status of the people who died after December 1, 2020, with whom they have the closest relationships. This could mean that a single person could report about as many deaths as he can for people they personally knew, beginning with the person closest to them.
All deaths are to be reported, no matter the cause, as long as these individuals died after the given date.
The first set of results from 1,700 reports revealed that nobody under 60 years old should get the vaccine as there had been no evidence that this could benefit them. People aged 40 to 60 are found to be more likely to die from the vaccine itself.
It also showed that the younger a person is, the more likely it is for the vaccine to be dangerous. These results are more consistent with what censored individuals have been saying that the government and mainstream media did not want the public to know.
What is interesting, according to Kirsch, is that people over the age of 60 are more likely to get benefits from the vaccine, which is inconsistent with Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) data, embalmer data and Medicare data.
Due to the conflicting evidence, Kirsch believes it is safer to avoid the COVID vaccines for all ages. (Related: Recently released Pfizer documents show mRNA COVID-19 vaccine can cause 1,291 different adverse events.)
Pfizer falsifies trial data
A whistleblower working with Pfizer’s subcontractor for the phase 3 trial has come out to say that there had been problems with their data collection and that the company has “falsified” data. The whistleblower added that there had been poor practices at the facilities, raising concerns about lax regulatory oversight.
What’s even more interesting is that the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) did not immediately follow up on the complaint from the whistleblower, claiming it did not have the manpower to actively monitor and investigate all clinical trials despite the complaint coming from an employee of the data-collecting company itself.
Meanwhile, early treatment such as the Fareed-Tyson protocol showed a near-perfect track record against COVID with few hospitalizations and no recorded deaths. This protocol called for patients to be treated as early as the first four days of the infection and within five days of exposure. It involves treatment with hydroxychloroquine, zinc sulfate, azithromycin, doxycycline, ivermectin and aspirin.
Yet, so-called health experts ignored this treatment and pushed for many other useless alternatives such as screening, lockdowns, social distancing, mask-wearing and vaccines.
Visit Vaccines.news for more stories about the COVID-19 vaccines.
Watch the video below for more information about the dangers of COVID-19 vaccines.
by: Mary Villareal
Join: 👉 https://t.me/acnewspatriots
The opinions expressed by contributors and/or content partners are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of AC.NEWS
Disclaimer: This article may contain statements that reflect the opinion of the author. The contents of this article are of sole responsibility of the author(s). AC.News will not be responsible for any inaccurate or incorrect statement in this article www.ac.news websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner. Reprinting this article: Non-commercial use OK. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.
Discussion about this post