USA: Abu Zubaydah, a Guantanamo Bay detainee, filed a discovery request with the US government in an effort to obtain testimony from Central Intelligence Agency contractors James Mitchell and John Jessen, psychologists who helped craft the CIA’s ‘enhanced interrogation techniques,’ which included rectal feeding, hanging by handcuffs, and waterboarding.
The US Supreme Court on Thursday ruled in favor of the US government regarding Abu Zubaydah‘s request to learn more about the torture he endured at a CIA black site in Poland after being taken from Pakistan in 2002 under suspicion of terrorism.
“Zubaydah’s discovery request could force former CIA contractors to confirm the location of the detention site and that confirmation would itself significantly harm national security interest,” read an opinion written by SCOTUS Justice Stephen Breyer, along with six colleagues.
“In our view, the Government has provided sufficient support for its claim of harm to warrant application of the privilege,” Justice Breyer added.
SCOTUS Justice Neil Gorsuch, joined by Justice Sonia Sotomayor, argued that their colleagues may be “ignorant as judges of what we know to be true as citizens.”
“Ending this suit may shield the government from some further modest measure of embarrassment,” wrote Gorsuch, along with Sotomayor. “But respectfully, we should not pretend it will safeguard any secret.”
Testimony and other information sought by Zubaydah and his lawyer would have been passed to Polish authorities that have been investigating his time at the secret CIA facility.
At the time of his 2002 capture in Pakistan, the US believed Zubaydah to be a high-ranking official of the al-Qaeda* terrorist group behind the September 11, 2001, terror attacks in the US.
He was held at CIA ‘black sites’ until he was transferred to the Guantanamo Bay Detention Camp in 2006. It has been reported that Zubaydah may have also been transported to the CIA’s first ‘black site’ in Thailand between 2002 and 2006.
“After the use of the CIA’s enhanced interrogation techniques ended, CIA personnel at the detention site concluded that Abu Zubaydah had been truthful and that he did not possess any new terrorist threat information,” the unclassified report detailed.
Although seven SCOTUS Justices argued that the release of such information could endanger national security or tarnish the reputation of the US, both Jessen and Mitchell have provided several testimonies and stories on their CIA torture program. Mitchell has also written a book on the subject.
During a 2020 testimony, Mitchell notably confessed to personally torturing Zubaydah over 60 times through the use of his waterboarding technique.
Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, one of the alleged co-conspirators of the 9/11 terror attacks, was tortured by Mitchell and Jessen through waterboarding.
While accepted by the Pentagon at the time, such tactics are now deemed torture.
7 October 2021, 20:42 GMT
Although the US government has granted the disclosure of information on how Zubaydah was treated, further details, including locations of the post-9/11 CIA ‘black sites,’ have been kept from public knowledge, with officials citing national security concerns and commitments to foreign partners.
Zubaydah, who has never been convicted or charged with a crime by the US, remains an indefinite inmate at the Guantanamo detention center.
*Al-Qaeda is a terrorist organisation outlawed in Russia and many other states
Features image: © AP Photo / Alex Brandon
by Evan Craighead
Join: 👉 https://t.me/acnewspatriots
The opinions expressed by contributors and/or content partners are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of AC.NEWS
Disclaimer: This article may contain statements that reflect the opinion of the author. The contents of this article are of sole responsibility of the author(s). AC.News will not be responsible for any inaccurate or incorrect statement in this article www.ac.news websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner. Reprinting this article: Non-commercial use OK. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.
Discussion about this post