First, a quick overview of the various “factchecking” organization statements. How many people developed brain damages or lost their life or that of a loved one because of accepting a vaccine based on the falsehoods propagated by these grossly unqualified “factcheckers”? Do they have criminal liability for their falsehoods and propaganda?
As you look through this, please keep in mind that the FDA has approved three doses of these mRNA vaccines for administration to all of our 5-11 year old children. Under emergency use authorization, of course. Even though there is no medical emergency.
COVID-19 Vaccine-Generated Spike Protein is Safe, Contrary to Viral Claims
Posted on July 1, 2021. Link here.
Catalina Jarmillo’s training is from the Columbia School of Journalism.
Why would anyone place any credence in what she has to say about toxicology and molecular virology? How many excess deaths can be attributed to this lie?
No sign that the COVID-19 vaccines’ spike protein is toxic or ‘cytotoxic’
POLITIFACT CONTRIBUTING WRITER
Tom Kertscher is a contributing writer for PolitiFact. Previously, he was a fact-checker for PolitiFact Wisconsin.
You can find this article here.
And why would anyone believe Tom Kertscher, who has no training in medicine or biology, let alone molecular virology? And why is a political fact checking site making assessments about biology and toxicology anyhow?
Spike protein produced by vaccine not toxic
By BEATRICE DUPUY
June 9, 2021
Another doozey. You can find it here.
Now, let us review the actual science.
Not what these wannabe scientists who are actually journalists at best claim to be true.
First off, it is important to understand a little bit about the SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein.
The only difference in the actual protein sequence between the original “Wuhan” strain Spike protein of the virus, and that coded for by the genetic vaccines, is two amino acids which have been changed in the S2 region of the protein. These were not introduced to make that vaccine version less toxic (as some “factcheckers” have asserted), but rather to make it better able to stimulate an antibody-based immune response. Whether vaccine encoded or virus encoded, the S1 subunit (which includes the receptor binding domain (to which the majority of “neutralizing” antibodies are directed) gets cut free (“proteolytically cleaved’) to yield an S1 subunit which is free to circulate in the blood, bind ACE2 receptors, interact with platelets, neurons, open up vascular endothelial tight junctions etc. THERE IS NO DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE S1 SUBUNIT RELEASED FROM THE VACCINE SPIKE PROTEIN AND THE S1 SUBUNIT RELEASED FROM THE VIRUS SPIKE PROTEIN. THEY ARE THE SAME DAMN THING!
Now, how much and for how long does this free S1 subunit spike protein, including the receptor binding domain, become produced by the mRNA vaccines, versus how much and for how long by natural infection?
Surely this was well understood and characterized by Pfizer before these vaccines were widely deployed? Surely the FDA required that these studies be performed?
NOPE. WE HAD TO WAIT UNTIL AN ACADEMIC GROUP DID THE STUDIES AND PUBLISHED AT THE END OF JANUARY 2022. AND BURIED THE FINDINGS BY USING AN OBSCURE TITLE.
WELL, ISN’T THAT INTERESTING.
So, the vaccine produces far more spike S1 subunit for far longer than the natural infection does. Hmm. Curiouser and curiouser.
But is the S1 subunit (which is identical between the virus and the vaccine) actually a toxin? Good question. Let’s look into that. One moment…. searching. There.
First question – does spike S1 subunit get into the brain across the blood brain barrier?
Why yes, Virginia, thank you for asking. It does! You are such a good student.
You can find and read the article yourself here.
Next question. Does Spike S1 do any damage to the brain when it hits nerve cells (neurons)? Oops. Looks like it does! Who would have guessed. Well, who among those scientists who are not misinformation spreaders?
Read it for yourself here.
AND THEN THERE IS THIS ONE.
Read this one here.
•COVID-19 generates cerebrovascular, sensitive, motor, cognitive and diffuse brain disorders.
•The trigeminal and vagus nerve or the gut-brain axis are the entrance of SARS-CoV-2 in brain.
•SARS-CoV-2 affects brain by neuroinvasion and by the consequences of the systemic infection.
•COVID-19 favors BBB disruption, inflammation, hypoxia, and secondary infections.
•The study of the neurological affectation of COVID-19 raises a new challenge for neuroscience.
For this one, it is important to recognize that there is no significant difference between the symptoms of long COVID (PASC) and post vaccination syndrome.
And you can read all about it here.
And then there is this little issue of demyelination of nerve cells. That is sort of like stripping off the insulation on a wire. Causes short circuits and all sorts of problems.
Yipes. Read here.
And brain endothelial attack. What could possibly go wrong?
Which you can read here.
SO, I ASK YOU, WHO WAS RIGHT? THE SCIENTISTS OR THE FACTCHECKERS?
IS THE SPIKE S1 SUBUNIT PRESENT IN BOTH VIRUS AND THE PRODUCT OF THE GENETIC INOCULATIONS A TOXIN?
“A toxin is a harmful substance produced within living cells or organisms; synthetic toxicants created by artificial processes are thus excluded. The term was first used by organic chemist Ludwig Brieger (1849–1919) and is derived from the word toxic.”
by Robert W Malone MD, MS
Join: 👉 https://t.me/acnewspatriots
The opinions expressed by contributors and/or content partners are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of AC.NEWS
Disclaimer: This article may contain statements that reflect the opinion of the author. The contents of this article are of sole responsibility of the author(s). AC.News will not be responsible for any inaccurate or incorrect statement in this article www.ac.news websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner. Reprinting this article: Non-commercial use OK. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.
Discussion about this post