Ever since the roll out of the experimental COVID-19 “vaccines” there has been abundant anecdotal evidence of “vaccine shedding,” where individuals who received one of the experimental mRNA injections were somehow also infecting those around them, even those who were unvaccinated.
Now there are some published studies that explain how the mechanism of this “shedding” might be happening, as well as evidence from Pfizer themselves according to their internal documents that they have been forced to release to the public.
We have already dealt with the issue in previous investigations by Gospa News. In this article, we publish the extreme synthesis of various research and documents that demonstrate the same chilling theory based on two different reports: one from the American site Health Impact News and another from the British site The Esposè.
Peter McCullough is another FLCCC member with top-notch medical credentials who is being persecuted by the medical establishment for his outspokenness about early treatment and the dangers of the COVID shots.
As early as August 2021, the American medical doctor released the research by the Oxford University Clinical Research Group which showed that the vaccinated in some cases had had an infectious viral load 251 times higher than that of the unvaccinated, thus exposed to risk of contagion.
The publication of that and other research cost McCulloug the withdrawal of his medical credentials by health authorities.
This is an impediment to the exercise of the activity similar to the suspension that the Order of Doctors has implemented in Italy against various doctors, such as the surgeon Andrea Stramezzi, only because they have treated symptomatic Covid-19 patients with anti-inflammatories and other commonly used drugs by not respecting the dangerous government protocol of “paracetamol and watchful waiting”.
But this government protocol, according to virologist Maria Rita Gismondo, would have caused tens of thousands of deaths precisely due to the absence of a real and effective early cure against SARS-Cov-2 infection.
That article caused Gospa News, as well as Robert F. Kennedy jr.’s The Defender website. who first gave space to the American doctor, the temporary, and then definitive, blockade on various social networks (Linkedin, YouTube and Facebook) in compliance with a strategy that would have been decided worldwide by Anthony Fauci, adviser for the Covid-19 emergency 19 of the White House, as is emerging from a lawsuit initiated by the attorneys general of the US states Missouri and Louisiana.
Now authoritative scientists point out the risk of a transmission of mRNA gene serums between vaccinated and unvaccinated. One of those studies was published by French researcher Dr. Helene Banoun in the journal Infectious Disease Research.
Abstract of Banoun’s Study
The massive COVID-19 vaccination campaign is the first time that mRNA vaccines havebeen used on a global scale. The mRNA vaccines correspond exactly to the definition of gene therapy of the American and European regulatory agencies. The regulations require excretion studies of these drugs and their products (the translated proteins).
These studies have not been done for mRNA vaccines (nor for adenovirus vaccines). There are numerous reports of symptoms and pathologies identical to the adverse effects of mRNA vaccines in unvaccinated persons in contact with freshly vaccinated persons. It is therefore important to review the state of knowledge on the possible excretion of vaccine nano particles as well as mRNA and its product, the spike protein.
Vaccine mRNA-carrying lipid nano particles spread after injection throughout the body according to available animal studies and vaccine mRNA (naked or in nano particles or innatural exosomes) is found in the bloodstream as well as vaccine spike in free form or encapsulated in exosomes (shown in human studies). Lipid nano particles (or their natural equivalent, exosomes or extracellular vesicles (EVs)) have been shown to be able to be excreted through body fluids (sweat, sputum, breast milk) and to pass the transplacental barrier.
These EVs are also able to penetrate by inhalation and through the skin (healthy or injured) as well as orally through breast milk (and why not during sexual intercourse through semen, as this has not been studied). It is urgent to enforce the legislation on gene therapy that applies to mRNA vaccines and to carry out studies on this subject while the generalization of mRNA vaccines is being considered.
Dr. Peter McCullough recently addressed this study.
From Dr. McCullough’s Substack Blog – All links to Gospa News articles have been added aftermath
Health of Pure Bloods Threatened by Shedding of mRNA and Spike Protein
Why the Unvaccinated are Concerned about Close Contact with COVID-19 Vaccinated
One of the most common questions I am asked from the unvaccinated stems from concerns over “shedding.” Because the mRNA vaccines have been in development by the US Department of Defense DARPA since 2011, one would have expected that all of the necessary preclinical testing would have been completed before Operation Warp Speed was announced.
The 2015 FDA guidance on Gene Product Shedding Studies with gene therapies, which are defined as “all products that exert their effects by transcription and/or translation of transferred genetic material and/or by integration into the host genome and that are administered in the form of nucleic acids, viruses or genetically modified microorganisms”.
By this statement mRNA vaccines are indeed gene therapy products and should have been submitted to these excretion studies by DARPA funded researchers long ago.
Sadly, these careful development steps were skipped from the beginning in our military-style vaccine development program, and now the public is grappling with the issue of nucleic acid and Spike protein shedding as a potential concern among those who have worked so hard to remain healthy and free of COVID-19 vaccination.
In the most comprehensive paper on shedding thus far, former Inserm researcher Dr. Helene Banoun has published the basis for which there is great likelihood that mRNA either on lipid nanoparticles or within exosomes is circulatory in blood and is secreted in every body secretion that would naturally expect to contain particles of this size.
Fertig et al, have shown mRNA is circulatory in blood for at least two weeks with no reduction in concentration out to that time point. Likewise, Hanna et al, have found mRNA within breast milk.
Less data exist on Spike protein shedding but it is not a far stretch to understand this is well within the realm of reality. The pivotal questions are: 1) for how long is a recently vaccinated person at risk to shed on to others? 2) can shed mRNA be taken up by the recipient and begin to produce Spike protein just like vaccination? 3) can shed Spike protein cause disease as it does in the vaccinated (e.g. myocarditis, blood clots, etc.)?
It’s time for the lapses by DOD BARDA and NIH BARDA, to immediately be corrected by those agencies funding the necessary independent shedding studies to ensure the public safety of those who wisely deferred on COVID-19 vaccination.
This research should preferably be conducted while the current products are paused and taken off to market to protect others at risk. Until then, we simply cannot answer these questions for those who sacrificed so much to remain “pure-blood.” (Full article.)
Another study has been published on the Preprint Server Medrxiv.org titled: Evidence for Aerosol Transfer of SARS-CoV2-specific Humoral Immunity.
While this study was not specifically studying how vaccinated people could be infecting unvaccinated people, but was studying how “herd immunity” could be achieved, it does provide data on the vaccinated spreading something, in this case defined as “antibodies,” to the unvaccinated.
This study assumes that COVID vaccines are positive, and that spreading “antibodies” to the unvaccinated is positive also.
The vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 have maintained remarkable efficacy against severe disease and death in those vaccinated regardless of variant emergence, Omicron included. Less appreciated than the systemic immunity generated by the vaccines are the high levels of antibody (IgG and IgA) found within the nasal cavity and saliva of vaccinees.
This outcome is found in both humans and primates, and in response to both mRNA and protein-based vaccines. Respiratory transmission of viral infection is proof that oral/nasal cavity constituents can be communicated through aerosols and/or respiratory droplets. As such, it would stand to reason that antibody present within the oral/nasal environment may also be aerosolized to some degree. (Full study.)
The Exposé recently discussed this study, as well as internal Pfizer documents that have now been made public that suggest “vaccine shedding” does occur with the mRNA shots.
Confidential Pfizer Documents & New Study confirm COVID ‘Vaccine Shedding’ has been occurring with shocking & dangerous consequences
A study conducted by scientists at the University of Colorado confirms the vast majority of humanity has had absolutely no choice in the matter of whether they wish to get the Covid-19 injection or not because the vaccinated have been transmitting antibodies generated by the injections through aerosols.
The findings should however come as no surprise because a confidential Pfizer document had already confirmed exposure to the mRNA injections was perfectly possible by skin-to-skin contact and breathing the same air as someone who had been given the Covid-19 jab.
The document contains a whole section covering the possibility of ‘mRNA vaccine shedding’ in which it is possible for those who have been in close proximity to someone who has had the Pfizer mRNA jab to suffer an adverse reaction.
Section 8.3.5 of the document, it describes how exposure during pregnancy or breastfeeding to the Pfizer mRNA jab during the trials should be reported to Pfizer Safety within 24 hours of investigator awareness. This is strange because pregnant women / new mothers were and are not part of the safety trials. So how can they be exposed?
Well, Pfizer confirms that exposure during pregnancy can occur if a female is found to be pregnant and is environmentally exposed to the vaccine during pregnancy. The document states that environmental exposure during pregnancy can occur if a female family member or healthcare provider reports that she is pregnant after having been exposed to the study intervention by inhalation or skin contact.
Or if a male family member of a healthcare provider who has been exposed to the study intervention by inhalation or skin contact then exposes his female partner prior to or around the time of conception.
«They also, unfortunately, add weight to the claims made by Dr Phillipe van Welbergen, who demonstrated that graphene, an alleged undisclosed ingredient of the Covid-19 injections, is being transmitted from the vaccinated to the not-vaccinated and destroying red blood cells and causing dangerous blood clots. (Full article.)» writes The Exposé.
«It would appear there was never any need to waste an extortionate amount of taxpayers’ money on propaganda to coerce the public into getting the Covid-19 injections. Because the taxpayer never had a choice in the matter. All they had to do was breathe» adds instead Brian Shilhavy Editor of Health Impact News..
On the cover image the medical doctor Peter McCullough and the study by the French researcher Dr. Helene Banoun
by Fabio Giuseppe Carlo Carisio
Join: 👉 https://t.me/acnewspatriots
The opinions expressed by contributors and/or content partners are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of AC.NEWS
Disclaimer: This article may contain statements that reflect the opinion of the author. The contents of this article are of sole responsibility of the author(s). AC.News will not be responsible for any inaccurate or incorrect statement in this article www.ac.news websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner. Reprinting this article: Non-commercial use OK. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.