Liver inflammation (hepatitis) in children is on the rise in the United Kingdom, prompting an urgent investigation by the U.K. Health Security Agency (UKHSA).
Authorities say they have no idea why the disease is spreading among young people, but the elephant in the room that they are ignoring is Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) “vaccines,” and particularly those made using mRNA (messenger RNA) technology.
Children as young as five are now being injected with these chemical poisons, which accumulate in the liver and cause, you guessed it: hepatitis. Keep in mind that hepatitis vaccines also cause diseases.
In Scotland, where people five years of age and older are also getting jabbed with mRNA, hepatitis is also on the rise. According to reports, none of the cases currently under investigation involve any of the common viruses that cause hepatitis, further suggesting that COVID jabs are the culprit.
Hepatitis symptoms include dark urine; pale, grey-colored feces; itchy eyes; yellowing of the skin and eyes (jaundice); muscle and joint pain; a high temperature; feeling and being sick; chronic fatigue; loss of appetite; and stomach pain.
Pfizer’s own study shows mRNA chemicals accumulate in liver, cause hepatitis
The U.K.’s National Health Service (NHS) is reportedly working with UKHSA and various public health organizations across Great Britain to get to the bottom of the cause of this outbreak – or so they say.
Since mRNA injections will probably never even get a mention as a possible cause, these government agencies will spin their wheels while never producing an honest result. Such is the nature of government.
The world was told that the spike proteins found in (viral vector) and produced by (mRNA) Fauci Flu shots remain at the injection site and only persist there for a couple weeks – but this is not the case.
Research conducted by Pfizer, one of the two pharmaceutical corporations that produces mRNA injections – the other is Moderna – shows that spike proteins from the injections circulate throughout the body and end up concentrating in the liver.
“The greatest mean concentration outside the injection site was observed in the liver, with values of 27.916 ?g equiv lipid/g (equivalent to 21.5 percent dose) in males and 30.411 ?g equiv lipid/g (equivalent to 18.4 percent dose) in females,” the study revealed.
A bio-distribution study conducted by the Japanese government also found that COVID injection spike proteins travel from the injection site through the bloodstream before landing in vital organs such as the liver, spleen, adrenal glands and ovaries.
For at least 48 hours post-injection, these accumulated spike proteins live inside vital organs, potentially causing damage. In animals that received Pfizer’s BNT162b2 injection, the following reversible hepatic effects were observed:
- Enlarged liver
- Vacuolation
- Increased gamma-glutamyl transferase (yGT) levels
- Increased levels of aspartate transaminase (AST) and alkaline phosphatase (ALP)
One study found that once mRNA chemicals from the Pfizer injection enter human liver cells, they trigger cellular DNA inside the nucleus to increase the production of the LINE-1 gene expression, which is needed to produce mRNA.
“The mRNA then leaves the nucleus and enters the cell’s cytoplasm, where it translates into LINE-1 protein,” reported the Daily Exposé about the study.
“A segment of the protein called the open reading frame-1, or ORF-1, then goes back into the nucleus, where it attaches to the vaccine’s mRNA and reverse transcribes into spike DNA.”
The same study also found that spike proteins expressed on the surface of liver cells may be targeted by the immune system, potentially causing autoimmune hepatitis.
“There [have] been case reports on individuals who developed autoimmune hepatitis after BNT162b2 vaccination,” the study said.
Sources include:
by: Ethan Huff
Join: 👉 https://t.me/acnewspatriots
The opinions expressed by contributors and/or content partners are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of AC.NEWS
Disclaimer: This article may contain statements that reflect the opinion of the author. The contents of this article are of sole responsibility of the author(s). AC.News will not be responsible for any inaccurate or incorrect statement in this article www.ac.news websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner. Reprinting this article: Non-commercial use OK. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.
Discussion about this post