Sunak is not a “politician” in any conventional sense but rather, he is an infiltrating asset of the deep state who has been manoeuvred into power on their behalf and to fulfil their requirements.
Rishi “richer than the Royals” Sunak presides over a huge fortune, with his personal wealth set at £730 million and his good lady wife’s, $1.2 billion. Why would such a fabulously wealthy man want to slum it in a glorified office job for £160k?
It is transparently obvious that Sunak is not occupying the highest office in the land for any reason but nefarious ones and to serve his real masters, whom – surely needless to say – are certainly not the British public. So, who is he really serving and why?
There was a very revealing piece in the Daily Mail which stated that Rishi Sunak studied at Stanford, but NONE of his professors remembers him!
If someone claims to have attended a university, yet none of their professors has any recollection of them having done so, what is the most likely explanation for this?
The most likely explanation is that they didn’t really “attend” – at least, not in the conventional sense – and that rather, this is part of a concocted backstory often given to spooks to conceal the time they spent in intelligence training. I remember a very similar scenario occurring with Barack Obama – that nobody at the university he claimed to have attended had any recollection of him.
Sunak was at Stanford on a top and highly sought-after scholarship – The Fulbright Scholarship – signifying great academic prowess. The Fulbright Scholarship is a sign someone has been identified as highly talented and is destined for greatness, with its alumni list a glittering who’s who of top politicians, literary stars, and other major establishment players. So, with this and other extraordinary credentials to Sunak’s name, is it really plausible that none of his professors remembered him?
No, it isn’t. The reason they don’t remember him is that Sunak’s time at Stanford was not spent attending lectures and doing coursework for an MBA, as the “official story” suggests. That was the cover for what he was really doing there: training as an intelligence asset with the CIA and similar agencies in order to fulfil his future role of infiltrating the UK political establishment to install the deep state’s agenda.
Sunak was almost certainly recruited for this programme whilst at Oxford, his philosophy, politics and economics (“PPE”) degree being known prime hunting ground for intelligence agencies. Interestingly, MI6 has been focused in recent years on recruiting more assets from minority backgrounds.
Much has been made in the press of Sunak’s Indian heritage, which is a powerful political weapon to crush dissent – anyone who criticises or scrutinises the man can immediately be quashed with accusations of “racism“.
Of course, Rishi’s race is completely irrelevant. The idea that an enormously wealthy privately educated recipient of the Fulbright Scholarship has somehow endured a difficult path in life due to his race and, therefore, that his undemocratically inhabiting the highest office in the land is a victory for oppressed minorities, is totally ridiculous – but it’s a handy red herring to derail the real discussion, namely, his quite obvious intelligence background.
So, now we have a highly trained intelligence asset working for the deep state installed in the country’s most powerful office, and – while he won’t be there for long – he has not spent 15 years in training for this for nothing. He has been tasked with first creating a financial crisis through printing billions with “furlough” and the like, and then initiating the “solution” to the problem he intentionally created – e.g., some combination of CBDCs, digital IDs, and social credit scoring, as per the business interests of his wife’s ultra-wealthy and powerful family, and the deep state that very powerful families are always closely entwined with.
Once he’s got this part of the agenda in motion, a General Election will be called and I would put good money on the fact that, at this point, Mr. Sunak will disappear from public life altogether.
The key thing to remember when analysing what’s going on in the political pantomime, or indeed anything else on the world stage, is just how much of modern life and global events are illusory – staged deceptions concocted by intelligence agencies to dupe the public. High-level politics isn’t “real”, it’s a military-intelligence psy-op, just like its close cousin, Hollywood (note the relentless crossover between politics and showbiz – this is because they are, in effect, exactly the same thing).
Rishi Sunak is no more a legitimate “Prime Minister of Britain”, genuinely invested in improving the direction of the country and the lives of the people in it, than Hugh Grant was in Love Actually (and indeed, were it to go to the polls, I think we can safely assume Mr. Grant would get markedly more votes). It’s all theatre – and it’s a production that has been going on for a very long time, since at least the 1950s, when Operation Mockingbird was introduced, a high-level propaganda campaign with the ultimate aim of creating a completely false reality, using fake news stories and other means, as this gives the architects of the deception such enormous power.
“We’ll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false.” – so said William J. Casey, director of the CIA, in 1981 (when Rishi Sunak was one).
“They” know just how much power they have over the public consciousness when they can get the public to invest in a fabricated mirage – as Voltaire said, “those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities” – so the way we reclaim our power is by relentlessly exposing them, drawing attention to the holes in their narrative (cf. being a top scholar and campus celebrity at a university where nobody remembers you), and refusing to ratify their dark mind games by treating them as real.
by Rhoda Wilson
Join: 👉 https://t.me/acnewspatriots
The opinions expressed by contributors and/or content partners are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of AC.NEWS
Disclaimer: This article may contain statements that reflect the opinion of the author. The contents of this article are of sole responsibility of the author(s). AC.News will not be responsible for any inaccurate or incorrect statement in this article www.ac.news websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner. Reprinting this article: Non-commercial use OK. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.
Discussion about this post