Every single House Democrat on the Judiciary Committee voted against a proposed amendment to a domestic terrorism bill that would have prevented deep state intelligence and security agencies from using American taxpayer dollars to “monitor, analyze, investigate or prosecute” Americans who refuse to get “vaccinated” for the Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19).
Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) broke the news about the party line vote on Twitter, revealing that “Due to a troubling DHS bulletin, @RepAndyBiggsAZ offered an amendment to prevent the targeting of Americans due to their views on COVID vax.”
“Every Dem. voted against his amdt!” Massie lamented about the Democrats’ flagrant disregard for Americans’ constitutional rights.
H.R. 350, also known as the Domestic Terrorism Prevention Act of 2021, authorizes various federal agencies, including the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), the Department of Justice (DoJ), and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) to use taxpayer money to “analyze and monitor domestic terrorist activity” and “take steps to prevent domestic terrorism.”
The definition of “domestic terrorism” under the Biden regime, however, is extremely loose, encompassing anyone who spreads “conspiracy theories” or “disinformation” online. How many conservatives will get mopped up under this definition?
One particular form of “domestic terrorism” that the Biden regime wants to stamp out are people who question the legitimacy of the 2020 election. A document released back in February specifically singles out such people.
“There is widespread online proliferation of false or misleading narratives regarding unsubstantiated widespread election fraud and COVID-19,” reads a memo from DHS. “Grievances associated with these themes inspired violent extremist attacks during 2021.”
“COVID-19 mitigation measures – particularly COVID-19 vaccine and mask mandates – have been used by domestic violent extremists to justify violence since 2020 and could continue to inspire these extremists to target government, healthcare, and academic institutions that they associate with those measures,” the memo goes on to state.
Democrats are fully in the pocket of Big Pharma (as are many Republicans)
After the memo was released, Rep. Andy Biggs (R-Ariz.) introduced an amendment to ensure that unvaccinated Americans do not get targeted by the legislation. The entire bill is trash, just to be clear, but the amendment would have helped slightly to prevent everyday Americans from being dubbed as “terrorists.”
But the Democrats would not have any of it. Since a Republican proposed the amendment, every single Democrat opposed it along party lines, demonstrating that fascism a is left-wing value.
“None of the funds authorized to be appropriated in this Act shall be used to monitor, analyze, investigate or prosecute any individual solely because that individual declined the administration of a vaccine to COVID-19 or expressed opposition to such administration,” the amendment reads.
The vote comes amid increased lobbying efforts by pharmaceutical giants Pfizer and Moderna to punish those who refuse to take its injections. It appears as though all Democrats are now fully in the pocket of Big Pharma.
Most Republican politicians are no better, just to be clear. But on this issue, the Republicans are more aligned with freedom than the Democrats are, and Americans need to know this as we enter midterm election season.
“First you invent a city and let fools gather there. Let the fools live for generations, only to forget how to survive outside that city. Then you pull the carpet from underneath them and declare an economic crisis,” wrote someone at Natural News about how this was all engineered long ago.
“For oligarchs it’s all fun and games. If you’re so rich and have access to everything and never have to do any honest work, you’ll start rotting and this is what you organize. You make books, movies and board games become alive.”
Sources for this article include:
by: Ethan Huff
Join: 👉 https://t.me/acnewspatriots
The opinions expressed by contributors and/or content partners are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of AC.NEWS
Disclaimer: This article may contain statements that reflect the opinion of the author. The contents of this article are of sole responsibility of the author(s). AC.News will not be responsible for any inaccurate or incorrect statement in this article www.ac.news websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner. Reprinting this article: Non-commercial use OK. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.
Discussion about this post