A letter to the editor that was submitted to Prince George Citizen, a popular Canadian newspaper, reveals that the vast majority of people who are dying from the Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) not only got “vaccinated” but also “boosted.”
A screenshot of data from the British Columbia Centre for Disease Control (BCCDC) shows that in mid-April 2022, half of all people in the province had already received their first booster injection. Between March 20 and April 16, 63 percent of people diagnosed with a covid infection had taken their first booster shot.
Even more astounding is the fact that of those who passed away during this time, supposedly from “covid,” a whopping 73 percent had received at least one booster shot. (Related: Several former senior officials at the U.S. Food and Drug Administration [FDA] have stated that covid booster shots are a fraud.)
Another dataset capturing infections and deaths between May 15 and July 9 of this year tells a similar story. During that time, 52 percent of BC residents had taken at least one booster shot, and 76 percent of all deaths attributed to “covid” during that time occurred among the boosted.
“If you look at the statistics from the BCCDC site, you will see that there is zero scientific evidence for keeping the vaccine passport in place,” the letter to the editor argues based on these data points.
BCCDC removes “outcomes by vaccination status” data from website to hide massive number of deaths among the boosted
Interestingly, the BCCDC quietly removed, as of July 28, the section from its website covering “outcomes by vaccination status,” which revealed all of this and more.
It appears as though BCCDC is trying to hide the truth, which clearly shows that getting boosted massively increases one’s risk of dying.
When CTV News Vancouver asked the BC Ministry of Health for an explanation about the data removal, it received the following three excuses in return:
• Once the “Omicron” (Moronic) variant of Chinese Germs appeared out of nowhere, more people started taking at-home nucleic acid tests, supposedly reducing the reliability of infection data
• Many fully jabbed and fully boosted people who died already had underlying health conditions, we are told, so they probably died from that rather than the injections
• It is impossible to say for sure, according to the BC Ministry of Health, whether or not the jabs have anything to do with subsequent infections and death – it could all just be a big coincidence
These are the actual talking points of the BC Ministry of Health, reworded slightly to get the point across. They really think the general population is stupid – and perhaps they are right, seeing as how most people lined right up and rolled up their sleeves.
There is simply no logical way to explain away the fact that the vast majority of covid deaths in BC during the height of the booster campaign were, in fact, people who had gotten boosted. The unvaccinated, meanwhile, are generally in good health, based on the data.
“They are killing off the immune system to things we’d normally fight off,” wrote a commenter at The Epoch Times about what these so-called “vaccines” are actually doing to people’s bodies.
“Seniors already have developed ongoing health issues maintained by symptomatic treatments such as MS, Parkinson’s, Alzheimer’s, and Diabetes Type 1, kidney disease, and cancers … do these deaths correlate to the vaccine boosters?” wrote another.
Another asked how many more people need to die before another round of Nuremberg trials commences.
“Inquiring minds want to know,” this person added.
By Ethan Huff
Join: 👉 https://t.me/acnewspatriots
The opinions expressed by contributors and/or content partners are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of AC.NEWS
Disclaimer: This article may contain statements that reflect the opinion of the author. The contents of this article are of sole responsibility of the author(s). AC.News will not be responsible for any inaccurate or incorrect statement in this article www.ac.news websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner. Reprinting this article: Non-commercial use OK. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.
Discussion about this post