USA: Thanks to the advent of Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) “vaccines” under Operation Warp Speed, the number-five leading cause of death in the United States is on the rise.
Compared to seasonal flu shots, the risk of stroke following injection with a Fauci Flu shot (or two, or three) is 11,361 percent higher, the latest data from VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System) shows.
An investigation has found that per number of doses administered, “stroke” is about 115 times more likely to be suffered as an adverse reaction compared to the risk post-flu shot.
Between December 2020 and Feb. 11, 2022, a total of 4,543 adverse event reports involving a stroke were entered into VAERS. Recognizing that VAERS captures as little as one percent of all adverse events, the true number of strokes caused by China Flu shots is likely much higher.
Comparatively, a look at VAERS during the same timeframe reveals just 122 adverse event reports involving strokes for seasonal flu shots. This is how the comparison was made.
“Taking these numbers at face value, you could assume that the Covid-19 injections have proven to be 37 times more likely to cause a stroke than the Flu vaccines,” reports the Daily Exposé.
“However, if you did make this claim you would probably be told that this is normal because many more people have received a Covid-19 injection. But unfortunately, both of these claims are wrong.”
Are covid injections the most dangerous “vaccine” ever?
It turns out that three times more flu shots have been administered in the United States over the past 13 years than covid injections. For every 14,101,639 doses administered, the investigation found, there was at least one case of stroke.
For Fauci Flu shots, comparatively, it is one stroke per 121,340, which is a much higher rate of illness. (Related: Fauci Flu shots are also causing massively high rates of myocarditis in the “fully vaccinated”.)
“This means the Covid-19 injections are 115 times / 11,361% more likely to cause the recipient to suffer a stroke than the flu vaccines,” the Exposé explains.
“These numbers absolutely destroy any statement made by the authorities that the Covid-19 injections are completely safe, just like official U.K. Government data destroys any statement made by the authorities that the Covid-19 injections are extremely effective.”
There are many other nasty adverse effects associated with covid injections that have similarly sent risk numbers soaring. It is almost as if these shots were designed to kill because that is exactly what they are doing.
Dr. Shankara Chetty has been giving testimony at the Grand Jury Proceeding by the People’s Court of Public Opinion, revealing that the spike proteins inside the jabs are causing severe allergic reactions in people, resulting in serious illness.
His research has concluded that severe illness supposedly caused by “covid” is actually an anaphylactic reaction to said spike proteins.
“I investigate everything, and I make sure that I fall back on the knowledge I’ve gained in those years of tertiary education and don’t really believe things too easily.”
“With the controversy around hydroxychloroquine, with the PCR test being used as a diagnostic tool, with the word that there is asymptomatic spread, I had a very healthy suspicion for what I was being told. So, with the knowledge that I had, I decided that I’m going to take this [Covid] on.”
Dr. Chetty is one of the brave souls who is administering things like hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) and ivermectin to his patients, in defiance of the government’s orders. But if it can save even one life from the devastating impact of these spike proteins and the diseases they cause, including stroke, then it is all worth it.
by: Ethan Huff
Join: 👉 https://t.me/acnewspatriots
The opinions expressed by contributors and/or content partners are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of AC.NEWS
Disclaimer: This article may contain statements that reflect the opinion of the author. The contents of this article are of sole responsibility of the author(s). AC.News will not be responsible for any inaccurate or incorrect statement in this article www.ac.news websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner. Reprinting this article: Non-commercial use OK. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.