The same public relations firm that was hired by pharmaceutical giants Pfizer and Moderna to promote Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) “vaccines” throughout the plandemic is also embedded within the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), we now know.
Weber Shandwick was awarded a $50 million contract to join the CDC’s “Division of Viral Diseases team,” reports indicate. Its purpose is to boost “health communication,” as that term is loosely defined.
At the very same time, Weber Shandwick has been a Pfizer partner since at least 2006, having worked with the company to elevate its public profile. It also partnered with Moderna in June following the success of that company’s mRNA (messenger RNA) Chinese Virus injection.
What this means is that the same company actively promoting private pharmaceutical interests is also working within a so-called public government agency to direct health policy. This is what is known as a conflict of interest. (Related: Remember when the CDC was caught removing covid jab injury reports from VAERS?)
CDC spends YOUR tax dollars promoting covid jabs and flu shots
From covid jabs alone, vaccine corporations including Pfizer and Moderna raked in $34 billion in profits last year. This equates to $1,000 a second, according to estimates – this is a lot of cash for something that has never been proven to do anything other than damage the body and lead to early death.
As more “boosters” are rolled out, even more cash will flow into Big Pharma’s coffers. And this would not be possible without the help of Weber Shandwick and its influence on both the CDC and Big Pharma.
The United States already purchased some 171 million doses of the all-new “bivalent” boosters being pushed for the latest variants and sub-variants of the Omicron variant, which many refer to as the Moronic variant.
Children as young as five years old are eligible for bivalent boosting.
We know from an employee’s LinkedIn account that Weber Shandwick’s involvement in this rollout comes from the CDC’s National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases (NCIRD).
“So excited to be starting a new role today!” the employee wrote on the social media platform. “I’m joining Weber Shandwick as an Account Director supporting a contract I know well, at the CDC’s NCIRD!”
Another employee responded to this person by stating: “Welcome back to the team!”
Weber Shandwick has also taken cash from the government in exchange for helping it to promote seasonal flu shots. Some $50 million in taxpayer dollars was spent on that deal, which was forged in 2020, the same year the Fauci Flu appeared.
“Its responsibilities included distributing social media posts and articles promoting vaccines, and sending press releases to the media,” reports En-Volve.com about what Weber Shandwick does for these clients.
“It was also involved in ‘paid media placement,’ a common euphemism for advertising.”
It is important to note that Weber Shandwick appears to have been working for both Pfizer and Moderna at the very same time for their jab campaigns, even though the two are competitors. This, combined with its CDC contracts, represents multiple conflicts of interest all at once.
“This new reporting that CDC had a contract with the same PR firm representing the manufacturers of the COVID-19 vaccine raises serious concerns,” wrote Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.), adding that he has repeatedly questioned federal officials about conflicts of interest issues.
“The American people deserve transparency and these conflicts of interest will be thoroughly investigated by our committee next year,” Paul added.
Right now, Weber Shandwick is the world’s second-largest PR firm, according to Provoke Media.
by: Ethan Huff
Join: 👉 https://t.me/acnewspatriots
The opinions expressed by contributors and/or content partners are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of AC.NEWS
Disclaimer: This article may contain statements that reflect the opinion of the author. The contents of this article are of sole responsibility of the author(s). AC.News will not be responsible for any inaccurate or incorrect statement in this article www.ac.news websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner. Reprinting this article: Non-commercial use OK. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.
Discussion about this post