Not only that, but the fake “immunity” the jabs procure actually goes negative after seven months, meaning the recipient’s immune system is worse off than prior to when they got injected.
Another study out of England that we covered back in the summer arrived at a similar conclusion, though that one found that Fauci Flu shots only provide about six weeks’ worth of fake “immunity.”
“Findings: Protection from infection below 50% after 4 months,” reported Citizen Free Press about the findings of the new Swedish study. “No protection measurable after 7 months (Pfizer). AstraZeneca wanes faster, even becomes NEGATIVE.”
Sweden was one of the only countries in the world to reject pretty much all of the plandemic hysteria and tyranny that was rolled out starting in early 2020. During that time, the country fared incredibly well – better, in fact, than most other countries in terms of “cases,” hospitalizations and deaths.
Lithuania, also known as Branch Covidian land, has a covid infection rate 16 times that of Sweden
Lithuania, on the other hand, which currently has the world’s strictest “vaccine passport” scheme, is seeing an all-time high of new “cases” per capita within its population.
Just six weeks after the mandatory jab protocol was put into place in Lithuania, infection rates skyrocketed like never before – far outpacing that of Sweden, which is pretty much covid-free at this point (see the image below for a comparison):
Six weeks into the world’s strictest vaccine pass regime, new COVID cases per capita in Lithuania are soaring to all-time highs—more than 16x that of Sweden, where new cases per capita continue to all-time lows despite dropping all restrictions. pic.twitter.com/6PIoXxKoIf
— Michael P Senger (@MichaelPSenger) October 23, 2021
It really is a shame to report these facts knowing that they will not make a lick of difference when it comes to the Lithuania-like plandemic fascism that continues to sweep our own country.
If only enough Americans would wake up to the fact that Sweden got it right and Lithuania got it wrong, we might just get back to the old normal instead of the “new” one.
Perhaps in time, a critical mass of the population will finally wake up – that is, if it is not already too late at that point. In the meantime, we can continue to try to get the word out to whomever will listen and be receptive to the truth.
“It’s time to do a mass handout of home tests, ivermectin and vitamins like they did in India and let most people acquire natural immunity through infection,” wrote one Citizen Free Press commenter. “Protect the most vulnerable and get this behind us!”
“The only way this ends is for people to get it and acquire natural immunity,” wrote another.
“Presuming that our newly exposed tyrants acquiesce (not likely without strong ‘persuasion’). The vaccines themselves are likely more harm than good. Only time will tell if there’s anything good about them at all. I’m terrified for my vaxxed family members.”
Another reiterated the fact that the Swedish study verified that getting jabbed actually creates negative immunity, just like many on the “fringe” have been warning.
“So they are admitting that your immune system may be worse off for having had the shot, and that you’ll get sicker than the unjabbed if you don’t keep getting boosters?” this person asked.
The Lancet pre-printed the new Swedish paper as part of SSRN First Look, “a place where journals identify content of interest prior to publication.”
More of the latest news about the Chinese Virus “vaccine” deception can be found at ChemicalViolence.com.
Join: 👉 https://t.me/acnewspatriots
The opinions expressed by contributors and/or content partners are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of AC.NEWS
Disclaimer: This article may contain statements that reflect the opinion of the author. The contents of this article are of sole responsibility of the author(s). AC.News will not be responsible for any inaccurate or incorrect statement in this article www.ac.news websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner. Reprinting this article: Non-commercial use OK. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.