USA: Hypocrite Elon Musk, the billionaire grifter-head of Tesla and SpaceX, is drawing attention to himself once again with a new dish of rebuke for Netflix.
According to Musk, who ironically enough gave his “gender neutral” baby a space alien name, Netflix is now “unwatchable” because it has been infected by the “woke mind virus.”
As a result, Netflix bled about 200,000 subscribers between January and March of this year, while another two million subscribers are slated to leave the streaming platform by June.
To try to stop this mass exodus, Netflix is proposing the introduction of advertisements during shows and movies, even though subscribers are paying to not have to watch ads.
Netflix is also trialing no longer allowing people to share their passwords, requiring each and every person who watches something on Netflix to pay full price for the company’s more-often-than-not lewd and crude, far-left content.
Unable to grasp why subscribers are leaving in the first place, Netflix is shifting blame away from itself and onto rival platforms that grew in popularity during the Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) plandemic. Such platforms include Disney+, AppleTV, Now TV, Warner Bros Discovery and Paramount.
Just to stay afloat, Netflix has also had to borrow some $16 billion over the course of a decade in an attempt to cover its production and business costs.
Without billions in taxpayer subsidies for his companies, Elon Musk would be a failure
It was early 2020 at the start of the plandemic, in fact, when Musk himself decided to go “woke” and name his genderless baby “X Æ A-12.” Two years have passed, and now Musk is pretending to be anti-this kind of thing as it pertains to Netflix.
Seeing as how all of Musk’s “success” was built on the backs of taxpayer subsidies, chances are that he sees some new grifting opportunity with the downfall of Netflix, which saw more than 30 percent of its stock price disappear following the release of the company’s latest subscriber numbers.
Perhaps Musk is hoping to create his own rival platform that will inevitably stream the same smut and filth, just with the money going into his pocket instead. The guy appears to have no morals, after all.
At the same time, Musk is not wrong about Netflix, which was taken over by Barack and Michelle Obama towards the end of the usurper’s two-term reign of terror in the White House.
It was around that time that Netflix really went downhill, promoting shows about pedophilia (i.e. Cuties), men getting “pregnant,” and other such perversion, which is Obama’s forte.
Musk cannot be faulted for drawing attention to the garbage factory known as Netflix, which is programming the masses with every kind of evil imaginable under the guise of “entertainment.”
Another endeavor of Musk’s that could be related to his sudden criticism of Netflix is his effort to buy out Twitter and take it private. The Tesla founder was willing to fork over $15 billion of his wealth to do this after purchasing a 9.1 percent stake in the company, making him the second-biggest shareholder in Twitter.
In its most recent quarter, Netflix lost 640,000 total subscribers in the United States and Canada, prompting management to point out that most of the company’s future growth will have to come from other countries. At the end of March, Netflix still had about 74.6 million subscribers in the U.S. and Canada.
“I was just saying to my husband a few weeks ago, ‘Let’s cancel Netflix; nothing good to watch’ and obviously I am not alone!” wrote a reader at the Daily Mail (U.K.).
Sources for this article include:
by: Ethan Huff
Join: 👉 https://t.me/acnewspatriots
The opinions expressed by contributors and/or content partners are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of AC.NEWS
Disclaimer: This article may contain statements that reflect the opinion of the author. The contents of this article are of sole responsibility of the author(s). AC.News will not be responsible for any inaccurate or incorrect statement in this article www.ac.news websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner. Reprinting this article: Non-commercial use OK. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.
Discussion about this post