USA: Judicial Watch has obtained more documents via a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request, this time from Moderna, which show that Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) “vaccines” destroy the health of not just those who get injected but also their offspring.
Test rats subjected to Moderna’s experimental mRNA (messenger RNA) shot bore children with serious rib malformations, the new documents show. This was never made public but the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) knew about it before emergency authorizing the jabs.
Former pharmaceutical executive Alexandra Latypova analyzed and reviewed the documents, which contain test results showing a high prevalence of skeletal malformations in the offspring of rats who were given mRNA-1273 (Spikevax mRNA) shots from Moderna.
“mRNA-1273-related variations in skeletal examination included statistically significant increases in the number of F1 rats with 1 or more wavy ribs and 1 or more rib nodules,” the documents state – F1 referring to rat offspring.
“Wavy ribs appeared in 6 fetuses and 4 litters with a fetal prevalence of 4.03% and a litter prevalence of 18.2%,” they add – litter referring to a group-birth of rats. “Rib nodules appeared in 5 of those 6 fetuses.”
For five days following the last dose – gestation day 13 – maternal toxicity was observed in the rats, the documents continue. This is the most sensitive period of time for rib development in rats, which occurs during gestation days 14 and 17.
Moderna only conducted one reproductive toxicity test for its covid injections, and this was it
Wavy ribs are ribs that improperly form, just to be clear. Moderna’s trials saw six out of around 149 rat babies suffer from this, as well as five that developed rib nodules.
Only female rats were given the Moderna shot, we also now know. For some reason, Moderna avoided testing its injections on male rats, possibly because the shots are known to devastate sperm counts.
Female rats received a human dose of 100 micrograms (mcg) of Spikevax mRNA both 28 and 14 days prior to mating and gestation days one through 13.
“1/2 rats euthanized before delivery to examine fetuses, the rest followed to 21 days after delivery,” Latypova says. “No numbers are provided for the study size.”
It turns out that this is the only reproductive toxicity test that Moderna ever conducted on its mRNA shot – and the outcome was a horror show. How the FDA used this study as evidence to prove the “safety” and “effectiveness” of the Moderna shot remains unknown.
“Neither Moderna nor Pfizer provided any dose calculations or justification information for dose selection in animal studies,” Latypova further added in a statement about how Pfizer is just as guilty of foul play in its animal trials.
“Doses of drugs, or especially biologics do not necessarily have linear relationships with toxicity or efficacy. It is likely a much more complex relationship and unfortunately not known at all.”
The FDA requires reproductive toxicity testing for all new medicines that could be taken by women with childbearing potential. Latypova knows this because she has worked at more than 60 pharmaceutical companies and mainly focused on reviewing the associated trials that were submitted to the FDA for approval.
Amazingly, the FDA looked at the outcome of this Moderna trial and declared via a January 30 statement that there are no adverse effects on postnatal developments.
“No vaccine-related fetal malformations or variations and no adverse effect on postnatal development were observed in the study,” reads an FDA statement on the Moderna Spikevax label.
It turns out that the Pfizer vaccine produces the same rib malformation effect in rats, which makes sense since it is a similar mRNA formula.
By Ethan Huff
Join: 👉 https://t.me/acnewspatriots
The opinions expressed by contributors and/or content partners are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of AC.NEWS
Disclaimer: This article may contain statements that reflect the opinion of the author. The contents of this article are of sole responsibility of the author(s). AC.News will not be responsible for any inaccurate or incorrect statement in this article www.ac.news websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner. Reprinting this article: Non-commercial use OK. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.
Discussion about this post