An experienced anonymous embalmer has stepped up and contacted Dr. Jane Ruby to show her pictures of horrible white fibrous clots pulled out of bodies as part of the preparations for embalming.
“Several days ago, I was contacted by another embalmer who has been finding these never before seen [before 2021] clots being pulled out of bodies,” Ruby said. According to the “Live with Dr. Jane Ruby host, the embalmer was having trouble inserting the embalming tools because there were obstructions. This is when they found the “disgusting, grotesque, white, fibrous, and slimy “clots.
“Right now, this person wants their identity kept private. The person worries for their own safety, but is courageous enough to bring these forward,” Ruby said and proceeded to thank the anonymous embalmer for sending the pictures.
“You’re an American hero. I know you feel this is a very frightening thing to do. Society and humanity owe you a debt just like it does Mr. [Richard] Hirschman and the other embalmers who have come to my attention and whose work will be brought out like this one today.”
One picture showed the abnormal, fibrous clot beside a normal, gel-like blood clot to show the difference. The anonymous embalmer said most of these came out of the neck vessels of not just one cadaver but of multiple deceased individuals, who were mostly in their early 20s. They were also able to verify that 100 percent of them were jabbed with the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) vaccines.
According to Ruby, the whistleblower’s revelation shared the same details as what Hirschman revealed a few months ago. The embalmer came out after seeing “unnatural blood clots combinations with strange fibrous materials” clogging the arteries and veins of the deceased approximately six months after the COVID-19 vaccines were rolled out.
Ruby said she is waiting right now for the secondary chemical analysis of Hirschman’s samples, which were sent to Health Ranger Mike Adams for further examination.
FDA authorized shots to children as young as six months of age
Ruby, horrified by the photos that showed the freaky clots of different sizes, said babies and toddlers are about to be sacrificed at the altar of depopulation now that the U.S. government has just authorized the bio-weapon shots for six-month-old babies and toddlers.
“Please don’t let babies and children get this. Please do whatever you can to stop them. Talk to the parents. Show them the pictures. Take a screenshot, and do whatever you can do because babies are going to start dying horrific deaths. They’re not going to be able to survive this,” Ruby pleaded.
On June 17, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) granted an emergency authorization (EUA) for mRNA vaccines to be injected into babies as young as six months old.
FDA admitted that even though Pfizer’s clinical trial “was determined not to be reliable due to the low number of COVID-19 cases that occurred in the study participants,” the FDA still pushed through with the authorization to administer the vaccines to the younger population.
“As with all vaccines for any population, when authorizing COVID-19 vaccines intended for pediatric age groups, the FDA ensures that our evaluation and analysis of the data is rigorous and thorough,” FDA top official Dr. Peter Marks said in a statement.
Brian Hooker, chief scientific officer for Children’s Health Defense, told the Epoch Times before Moderna and Pfizer were granted EUA: “From an efficacy standpoint, it makes absolutely no sense to approve these products.”
by: Belle Carter
Join: 👉 https://t.me/acnewspatriots
The opinions expressed by contributors and/or content partners are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of AC.NEWS
Disclaimer: This article may contain statements that reflect the opinion of the author. The contents of this article are of sole responsibility of the author(s). AC.News will not be responsible for any inaccurate or incorrect statement in this article www.ac.news websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner. Reprinting this article: Non-commercial use OK. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.