Analysis of Vaccination Vial Confirms Presence of Graphene Nanoparticles [VIDEO]

In program No. 63, La Quinta Columna (biostatistician Ricardo Delgado and Dr. José Luis Sevillano) shared some of the many photographs of the analyses that the team of researchers with whom they work have obtained after subjecting the substance to different techniques to determine each of its components.

As promised, they have delivered; the results are mind-blowing. Their theories about the presence of graphene oxide in the vials have been confirmed: there is definitely graphene oxide in the vials. All the suspicions they had about it have been allayed.

This program has been, perhaps, the most important to date due to the amount of information and evidence presented.

During the transmission, Ricardo Delgado clarified the following: “First of all, we are not saying that we are anti-vaccine. The problem is that this is not a vaccine, this is a dose of graphene to a person.“

As always, Orwell City has selected the key moments of the program along with the explanations given by La Quinta Columna.

Link: Rumble

Ricardo Delgado: What we are going to do from now on is to show the images we have from the optical microscope and electron microscope analysis of the vial.

I am going to show you a series of photographs. Pay close attention and then we are going to compare them with some material. We are also going to show the same photographs compared with this material and you can draw your own conclusions. But, as I say, those who have to draw them are the technicians and the doctors and professors who have made the study. However, it is important for you to know this because we always say that when someone goes to eat a hamburger, they ask what ingredients are in it. Well, they should at least know first hand what is in the vial, since they are going to inject it into their vein, right?

Well, this is TEM electron microscopy which is transmission electron microscopy. The electron microscope used is the JEM-2100Plus.

Let’s start with the electron microscope. This is what appears in the vial.

What you are seeing there, that whole area, the size is a micron, a micrometer which would be a thousand nanometers under the electron microscope. What you see, this suspicious mesh, is what we had to find out what it was in the first place.

Apart from this, other studies have been made that have determined what you already know. Nevertheless, let’s continue with the analysis of the photograph. The truth is that it looks like a satanic mesh. Let’s take a look at another one.

Here, also at 1 micrometer, a micron, which is one millionth of a meter and a thousand times more than a nanometer. There you see it a little bit better. Let’s see another one.

Here it is even more enlarged: 5 times more at 200 nanometers. And what I want you to notice is especially this blackish thing that appears over there as a kind of mesh, because what’s behind it are probably the holes, probably.

Here’s another one at 200 nanometers, but with a little bit more light. And as I say, the interesting thing in fact is the mesh, this mesh that covers everything.

This is a sample photo taken from the scientific literature:

That is what I want you to see. Now I’m going to put the image on the left of the vaccine sample, and on the right of the graphene. And you draw your own conclusions.

The first one is at 200 nanometers and the second one is at 500. Anyway, as I say, all the people who have worked with this material, obviously, when they have been presented with this material, have told us that without any doubt it is graphene oxide.

Apart from the evidence, as I say, of spectroscopy and magnetic resonance, we are now going to see some images under the optical microscope. These have much less magnification, but it is also significant. As you can see, this is the vial sample.

It appears as a kind of fold. The way they have of giving it to us to understand it, is as if it was a Kleenex (napkins) that has folds, and they appear in the bottom of a swimming pool. That is practically what they tell us. They tell me here to expand it a little bit more:

Well, that’s one of the optical microscope photographs with enough light, natural in this case, but with enough light. Let’s see another one. I’ll zoom in it as well.

The characteristic thing is, as I say, is that it’s like it’s a piece of rag, a piece of Kleenex, that’s the word. With certain folds at the bottom of something. Let’s look at some more photos.

It can be seen that it has a little bit of elevation, and it is important.

This is another one.

That’s what’s in the vaccine, okay? The vast majority of it. Another:

Still, look at the folds as if it were such a handkerchief. This is the characteristic shape of this material. Let’s see another.

This is optical microscopy, it has much lower magnification than what you have seen before at the nanometer level.

Another one. There are many, I have chosen the most representative ones.

Note the folds. Many times they are not evenly distributed or rectilinear figures, although most of them are. This is another one of them.

In fact, I think it is the same one, but with a little less magnification. Now you are going to see one with light, so that you can see it a little bit better.

And now we are going to do the same: I am going to show you one under the optical microscope, one of the sample, one of those that you have already seen, and below, but they will be in black and white, of graphene oxide. From the GO. Let’s take a look at it.

Above is the vial sample photo, both this one and the same one with light and below are the graphene nanoparticles. There is a resemblance. I tell you that what changes is the light in this case, and here they are taken in black and white. And this one is also very representative. Let’s compare the left one with the right one.

Here we have the sample on the left, which is the vaccine sample, and on the right in black and white, which was taken from the scientific literature, of graphene nanoparticles. Well, as I say, photos taken by people who work with this material and who have not hesitated to tell us that they also have the folds and characteristics of graphene oxide.

Well, as I have said, we have put this for your consideration. Of course, there are other techniques, even more evident and conclusive than the observation itself, which are already so. They already are. Especially those of absorption bands —the absorbance bands they are called—, with certain wavelengths in the electromagnetic spectrum and which give the signal, precisely, the peaks in the graphene oxide.

But all of this, as I say, although it is not up to us to do it, in due course, will be told by the doctors who have done this study, doctors from an official public institution in our country. When the time comes, those persons will even be interviewed and will present the report live, probably, or will make a video for us and we will also illustrate it here on the channel. But we, as we said and as we promised, we were going to put these photographs for you to see. We had no doubt because of the magnetic effect that it caused initially, and we also had no doubts about what was going, what is going in there. Now we know it much better and without any doubt.  Precisely this already confirmed hypothesis in theory, and is what allows us to extrapolate all the conclusions that we have been making in La Quinta Columna, the last few programs.

Link: Rumble

Ricardo Delgado: Today’s program, because I think it has been quite complete, above all, because of the images of the road that you were waiting for. There is someone who has asked if they can put the images elsewhere, well, you can do whatever you want. I can already tell you that you are going to be criticized, they are going to say: “This man has taken the images and has put the images he wanted!” I do not even want to give ideas, but obviously if we see that magnetism is being denied, imagine this. Because it hurts them.

Nevertheless, we will soon be submitting an expert report from the people who carried out the analysis. They are specialists and also work in official and public institutes and institutions. Once someone wants to discuss the results of the analysis, it is as simple as to make another one and contrast it, which is how it is done in the scientific method. You don’t do a “Sálvame” program, nor do you go on TV to Risto’s program. It is done at an internal and scientific level, and let them debate everything they have to debate, let them come to us with another analysis. Weren’t people out there who had said they were going to make an analysis? Then let’s do it, let us know what they you have found and then we can discuss. Or they can discuss with our researchers. In this sense, there is nothing more to say in this regard..

When the time comes, this information will be made public and will be made known to all of you, of course. And from then on, you will have to decide from now on, you should decide what you have to do: not to submit to this process of inoculation of graphene to the whole population. Do not allow under any circumstances —well, I do not even have to tell you anything about keeping your children away from being inoculated with this material— you yourselves, your relatives, to be directly grapheneated, to be inoculated with graphene oxide, because that is what is in the vial. Because that is what is in the vial. Do you want to comment something José Luis before closing the live broadcast??

Dr. José Luis Sevillano: No, just that: that every day that goes by, there are more people with magnetic arms and they are people who are on our side. But we have that imminence at our doorstep that gets us in and we have to hurry. We have to make a lot of people aware, as many people as we can. That’s my message today. And reason and truth are on our side. There is no complex. Anyone who contradicts this information about the vial, etcetera, etcetera, well, nothing happens; let him explain to you why the arm is magnetic. Even if he tells you: “It does not exist“, then let him tell millions of people who wear it. So we have reason and truth on our side and we want very much that we and the people of the generations to come are not magnetically marked cattle, controlled from a distance and made sick because of that control. We have a challenge. Never has humanity had such an important challenge and we have to fight the battle.

Ricardo Delgado: That is good. You have seen the optical microscope and electron microscope images. I don’t remember if it’s emission and transmission microscopy…?

Dr. José Luis Sevillano: Transmission electron and optical transmission electron microscope. Yes, that’s very interesting. What we’ve seen there. It has the value that it has. You have to believe what we are saying because it comes from the sources that are analyzing it. The report will be ready soon, because they are about to… it is already done, surely. But well, we need to make it official in the sense that we will see how we present it, where, how all this is done, but the work is done.

Ricardo Delgado: We still need to decide on the language. We will put it in several languages so that it can be spread all over the net and go where it needs to go. The German lawyer Reiner Fuellmich was also initially informed. We don’t know if this is going to work out that way, but as we always say: this will be finished from the bottom up. Of course it will be denounced, it will be legally denounced. You already know how justice works: it will go to Spanish courts, they will talk about traceability, it will go to the court in The Hague and then to the International Criminal Court. But obviously our job is to get to the end and we will exhaust all avenues. But the first and most important is that you have the knowledge of what is really happening.

Dr. José Luis Sevillano: That’s right, and let’s stop this. Let it all stop. Everything. To see that the next move is made by them, because at the moment they don’t give an answer. That is an answer. Not giving an answer is an answer that should make us alert. Courage! And you know that reason and truth are on our side. Science is on our side. Wherever you put your hand looking for articles, everything speaks of this. Do not have problems, there is nothing against this version that we are giving here. Only that which speaks of all the virology of this last year, which is all false if you realize it. Everything is false, it does not stand up, there are contradictions, everything is confusing or never seen. You can concentrate on that version, but you will lose. On the other hand, in this one, if you go in search of information as we have done, everything fits. Everything we have seen in the last year and what we are seeing and what we are going to see fits perfectly..