USA: Chicago Mayor Lori Lightfoot has issued a “call to arms” in response to a leaked ruling from the Supreme Court which would overturn Roe v. Wade, implying that the USSC would come for ‘LGBTQ+’ rights next.
“To my friends in the LGBTQ+ community—the Supreme Court is coming for us next. This moment has to be a call to arms,” she wrote in a Monday tweet, adding “We will not surrender our rights without a fight—a fight to victory!”
We will not surrender our rights without a fight—a fight to victory!
— Lori Lightfoot (@LoriLightfoot) May 10, 2022
So – citizens arming up to protect themselves against gun-toting thugs in murderous Chicago: Bad.
LGBTQ+ citizens arming themselves against the Supreme Court over in an actual insurrection: Good
“If this isn’t a call to insurrection, what is?” tweeted Texas Scorecard publisher Michael Quinn Sullivan.
If this isn’t a call to insurrection, what is? https://t.co/vxTPymZUTr
— Michael Quinn Sullivan 🇺🇸 (@MQSullivan) May 10, 2022
“You’d think she’d be more concerned with her crime riddled city but here she is gaslighting & inciting,” wrote conservative pundit Rita Panahi, while pundit Matt Walsh wrote “Not satisfied with the murders just in her own city, Mayor Lightfoot calls for more violence across the country.” (h/t Fox News)
Call to arms.#DemMobViolence https://t.co/Niebrpp8oS
— Ted Cruz (@tedcruz) May 10, 2022
Call to arms? Are you declaring an insurrection? Civil war?
What is wrong with you?
Your city has the highest murder rate in the US with the strictest gun control laws.
Now you are making things up and calling for war?
Not a good idea.
Democrats, the party of violence. https://t.co/uZIkkCWL2x
— Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene🇺🇸 (@RepMTG) May 10, 2022
Goldfish face here wants a civil war. https://t.co/ljorKrAmCq
— John 1776 Cardillo (@johncardillo) May 10, 2022
As Jonathan Turley notes:
The Lightfoot comments only highlight the double standard applied by Democrats over free speech. Whether it is “disinformation” or violent speech, the Democrats have often excluded themselves from such standards. What is insurrectionary language for some is advocacy language for others. The alternative is to “fight like hell” for free speech . . . for everyone.
by Tyler Durden
Join: 👉 https://t.me/acnewspatriots
The opinions expressed by contributors and/or content partners are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of AC.NEWS
Disclaimer: This article may contain statements that reflect the opinion of the author. The contents of this article are of sole responsibility of the author(s). AC.News will not be responsible for any inaccurate or incorrect statement in this article www.ac.news websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner. Reprinting this article: Non-commercial use OK. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.
Discussion about this post